SB 444: Private Review Agents; certain decisions with regard to the provision of insurance coverage for healthcare services shall not be based solely on artificial intelligence systems; provide
Última acción: 5 de mayo de 2026 · Effective Date 2027-01-01
Senate Bill 444 would require that health insurance companies in Georgia have a licensed medical reviewer, not just artificial intelligence, sign off before denying coverage for a healthcare service.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto del proyecto de ley; no forman parte de él. El proyecto de ley está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Enrolled, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
Georgia insurance companies use private review agents and utilization review entities to decide whether to approve or deny coverage for medical treatments. This bill adds a new section to Georgia's insurance law (O.C.G.A. Chapter 46 of Title 33) addressing how artificial intelligence can be used in that process. The bill allows insurers to use artificial intelligence systems, artificial intelligence, or other software tools to automate tasks and help with decision-making, as long as those tools are part of an approved utilization review plan. However, it prohibits AI from issuing a final denial of coverage (called an adverse determination) to a patient on its own. A human private review agent or utilization review entity, including a clinical peer, must be involved before a denial is finalized, and AI cannot override that person's judgment. The law would take effect January 1, 2027.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Adds a new Code section (33-46-7.1) letting insurers use AI systems for utilization review, but only within an approved review plan.
- Bars AI systems from issuing an adverse determination (a coverage denial) to a patient without a human private review agent or utilization review entity involved.
- Requires a clinical peer, a medical professional with relevant expertise, to participate before a denial is finalized.
- States that AI tools cannot override or supersede the judgment of the clinical peer reviewing the case.
- Defines 'artificial intelligence' and 'artificial intelligence system' for purposes of this insurance law.
- Sets the law to take effect January 1, 2027.
A quién afecta
Health insurance companies and their private review agents and utilization review entities in Georgia, the clinical peers (licensed medical professionals) who review coverage decisions, and patients whose insurance claims go through utilization review for healthcare services.
Por qué importa
Patients seeking insurance approval for medical care would be guaranteed that a human medical reviewer, not just an automated algorithm, has a role in any decision to deny coverage. This could affect how quickly and how coverage denials are issued by Georgia insurers.
Disposiciones clave
- Section 1 adds Code Section 33-46-7.1 defining 'artificial intelligence' and 'artificial intelligence system' for insurance review purposes.
- Subsection (b) permits private review agents and utilization review entities to use AI tools if they are part of a compliant utilization review plan approved under existing standards and Commissioner rules.
- Subsection (c) allows AI to automate tasks and assist decision-making but bars it from issuing an adverse determination without a human private review agent or utilization review entity and a participating clinical peer.
- Subsection (c) also states AI tools cannot supersede the judgment of the clinical peer involved in the review.
- Section 2 sets the effective date as January 1, 2027.
- Section 3 repeals conflicting laws.
Del proyecto de ley
“such systems shall not issue an adverse determination to a patient until a natural person qualifying as a private review agent or a utilization review entity conducts a utilization review in which a clinical peer participates.”
“In no event shall artificial intelligence systems, artificial intelligence, or other software tools supersede the judgment of such clinical peer.”
Cronología del estado
- Effective Date 2027-01-01
- Act 411
- Senate Date Signed by Governor (Senado)
- Senate Sent to Governor (Senado)
- Senate Agreed House Amend or Sub (Senado)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Third Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
Mostrar el historial completo (16 acciones)
- House Second Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House First Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- Senate Passed/Adopted (Senado)
- Senate Third Read (Senado)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senado)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senado)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senado)
- Senate Hopper (Senado)
Patrocinadores
- Kay Kirkpatrick (R, SD-032)
- Ben Watson (R, SD-001)
- Mike Hodges (R, SD-003)
- Ed Harbison (D, SD-015)
- Larry Walker (R, SD-020)
- Lee Hawkins (R, HD-027)
Votaciones
- Votación: Senado11 de febrero de 2026
49 a favor, 0 en contra (0 sin votar, 5 ausentes)
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes19 de marzo de 2026
166 a favor, 0 en contra (3 sin votar, 7 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado25 de marzo de 2026
47 a favor, 0 en contra (2 sin votar, 5 ausentes)
Temas
- health insurance
- artificial intelligence regulation
- insurance coverage denials
- utilization review
- healthcare policy