Georgia CommonsMerilien v. State
Presentada el 13 de agosto de 2026 · Expediente S26A0704
El texto de la propia corte, leído de su PDF, sin los números de página y con sus líneas impresas unidas en los párrafos de la opinión. No se cambia ninguna palabra. El texto está en inglés.
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia
No. S26A0704
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
v.
The State
On Appeal from the Superior Court of Rockdale County
No. 2006CR1147
Decided: August 13, 2026
PINSON, Justice.
In 2006, Jean Jocelyn Merilien pleaded guilty to two counts of murder and one count of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. He was sentenced to two consecutive terms of life plus five years to serve in prison. He did not appeal.
Just over 19 years later, on September 3, 2025, Merilien sought relief under OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which allows a defendant to move for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal within 100 days from the expiration of the time to appeal under certain cir- cumstances, or until June 30, 2026, if the defendant had an out- of-time notice of appeal (or motion seeking one) dismissed under Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471 (2022). In a summary order, the trial court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction.
That decision was correct. This Court held in Cook that a trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider a motion for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal. See Cook, 313 Ga. at 505–06. In response, the General Assembly enacted OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which grants trial courts jurisdiction to consider such motions. See id.
§ 5-6-39.1(a)(2). 1 But in doing so, that statute also sets time limits for filing such motions: a defendant may move for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal “within 100 days from the expiration of the time period for the filing of” a notice of appeal, id. § 5-6- 39.1(a)(1), or, if an earlier out-of-time notice of appeal or motion seeking one was dismissed under Cook, until June 30, 2026, id. § 5-6-39.1(a)(1). Like other statutory requirements for obtaining an appeal, these time limits for seeking leave to file a notice of appeal are jurisdictional. See, e.g., Kelly v. State, 311 Ga. 827, 828 (2021); State v. Wheeler, 310 Ga. 72, 73 (2020); Duke v. State, 306 Ga. 171, 186 (2019); Gable v. State, 290 Ga. 81, 85 (2011). And Merilien’s motion here meets neither of these time limits, because the time for Merilien to appeal his 2006 convictions expired far longer than 100 days ago, see id. § 5-6-39.1(a)(1), and the record does not show that he had a motion or out-of-time notice of appeal dismissed under Cook, see id. § 5-6-39.1(b). So the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider Merilien’s motion, and it properly dismissed the motion on that basis.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Warren, P.J., not participating.
1 Code section 5-6-39.1 also grants jurisdiction to consider a motion for leave to file an out-of-time motion for new trial.