HB 414: Elections; "person" to include certain nonresidents; revise definition
Última acción: 11 de mayo de 2026 · Effective Date 2026-05-11
House Bill 414 would let Georgia's ethics law reach people outside the state who violate campaign finance rules, and it would speed up lawsuits the Attorney General brings to enforce those rules.
Los resúmenes de abajo son traducciones de resúmenes en inglés escritos por un modelo de IA (claude-sonnet-5) a partir del texto del proyecto de ley; no forman parte de él. El proyecto de ley está en inglés. Cite el texto, no el resumen. El texto almacenado es la versión Enrolled, la más reciente que tiene LegiScan.
El resumen en español de este proyecto de ley se está preparando. Mientras tanto se muestra el resumen en inglés.
En lenguaje claro
Georgia's campaign finance and ethics law (O.C.G.A. Chapter 5 of Title 21) currently defines 'person' in a way tied to entities recognized in Georgia. This bill expands that definition to include nonresidents, using the same definition of 'nonresident' already used in Georgia's long-arm statute (O.C.G.A. 9-10-90), so that someone outside Georgia who commits an act or does business in the state that would violate the ethics law can be held to the same rules a resident would face. The bill also changes how the Attorney General's enforcement lawsuits work: if a person sued does not respond within 30 days, the court must enter a default judgment against them, and if they do respond, a hearing must happen within 30 days of that response. It gives the State Ethics Commission new power to request documents or information from people located out of state, with court backup if they refuse. It also moves the case's location (venue) to Fulton County when the person involved is not a Georgia resident. The changes take effect once the Governor signs the bill or it becomes law without a signature.
Qué hace el proyecto de ley
- Expands the legal definition of 'person' in Georgia's campaign finance and ethics law to include certain nonresidents who act or do business in the state.
- Requires a default judgment against anyone sued by the Attorney General for an ethics violation who fails to respond within 30 days of being served.
- Sets a 30 day deadline for holding a hearing once a person sued does respond.
- Gives the State Ethics Commission authority to request documents or information from people or records located outside Georgia, with court enforcement if they refuse.
- Changes venue (the court where a case is filed) to Fulton County when the person involved is not a Georgia resident.
A quién afecta
Out-of-state individuals, businesses, or organizations that engage in political activity or business affecting Georgia elections, the Attorney General's office, the State Ethics Commission, and anyone facing a civil enforcement action under Georgia's campaign finance law.
Por qué importa
The change closes a gap that previously let out-of-state actors avoid Georgia's ethics rules simply by not being Georgia residents. It also speeds up enforcement cases with firm deadlines and gives investigators a clearer path to get evidence located outside the state.
Disposiciones clave
- Section 1 revises O.C.G.A. 21-5-3(19) to include nonresidents (as defined in O.C.G.A. 9-10-90) in the definition of 'person' if they act or do business in Georgia in a way that would violate the chapter.
- Section 2 amends O.C.G.A. 21-5-6 to require default judgment if a party sued by the Attorney General does not respond within 30 days, and a hearing within 30 days if they do respond.
- Section 2 also adds a new subsection letting the State Ethics Commission request documents or information located outside Georgia and petition a superior court to compel compliance if refused.
- Section 3 revises the venue rule in O.C.G.A. 21-5-8 so cases against nonresidents are filed in Fulton County instead of the person's county of residence.
- Section 4 makes the law effective as soon as the Governor signs it or it becomes law without a signature.
Del proyecto de ley
“shall include a 'nonresident' as that term is defined in Code Section 9-10-90 who commits an act or omission or transacts business within the state which if performed by a resident of this state would be subject to this chapter”
“a default judgement shall be entered against the party against whom relief is sought”
“unless the person is not a Georgia resident, in which case venue is in Fulton County”
Cronología del estado
- Effective Date 2026-05-11
- Act 438
- House Date Signed by Governor (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Sent to Governor (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Agreed Senate Amend or Sub (Cámara de Representantes)
- Senate Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Senado)
- Senate Third Read (Senado)
- Senate Engrossed (Senado)
Mostrar el historial completo (19 acciones)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Senado)
- Senate Recommitted (Senado)
- Senate Read Second Time (Senado)
- Senate Committee Favorably Reported (Senado)
- Senate Read and Referred (Senado)
- House Passed/Adopted By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Third Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Committee Favorably Reported By Substitute (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Second Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House First Readers (Cámara de Representantes)
- House Hopper (Cámara de Representantes)
Patrocinadores
- Todd Jones (R, HD-025)
- Buddy DeLoach (R, HD-167)
- Stan Gunter (R, HD-008)
- Mitchell Scoggins (R, HD-014)
- Scott Holcomb (D, HD-101)
- Randy Robertson (R, SD-029)
Votaciones
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes26 de febrero de 2025
153 a favor, 9 en contra (5 sin votar, 13 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado5 de febrero de 2026
29 a favor, 20 en contra (1 sin votar, 4 ausentes)
- Votación: Senado5 de febrero de 2026
50 a favor, 1 en contra (0 sin votar, 3 ausentes)
- Votación: Cámara de Representantes11 de febrero de 2026
167 a favor, 0 en contra (3 sin votar, 5 ausentes)
Temas
- campaign finance
- state ethics commission
- election law
- government transparency
- out-of-state enforcement