Ir al contenido
Georgia Commons
Menú

Buscar en todas las colecciones

Buscar en Georgia Commons

Proyectos de ley, opiniones de la Corte Suprema, el Código y las dos constituciones, y transcripciones de las reuniones de la Cámara y el Senado, en una sola búsqueda. Pregunte con palabras sencillas: la búsqueda ordena los pasajes por su significado y también por sus palabras.

Los documentos están en inglés, así que una búsqueda en inglés encuentra más.

Filtros:2024 Quitar filtros

Se encontraron 285 pasajes en 135 documentos.

Esto lista cada pasaje que encontró la búsqueda, una página a la vez. Informa lo que encontró, que puede no ser todo.

  1. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 29 de mayo de 2024

    Baker v. State

    S24A0478

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas de Kenneth Lee Baker por asesinato en las muertes de su esposa y su hijastra, rechazando sus argumentos de que las pruebas eran demasiado débiles y de que el juez de primera instancia debió haber dado una instrucción especial al jurado y excluido ciertas fotos y un cuaderno.

    K. B. testified that on May 16, 2010, he and his mother had spent the night at his aunt’s home in College Park. At 5:39 a.m. on May 17, 2010, Lynnale sent Baker’s cell phone a sexually suggestive text message, apparently intended for someone else. Lynnale dropped K. B. off at school and proceeded to the Griffin residence to see Shaelinda, according to K. B....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Baker v. State (S24A0478), decided 2024-05-29.

    Pursuant to a consent-to-search form signed by Baker, law enforcement searched Baker’s truck and found divorce papers and a notebook. The first page in the notebook began with the statement, “My name is Kenneth Lee Baker,” and included Baker’s address and names and some contact information for various people, including Baker’s father and children. The...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Baker v. State (S24A0478), decided 2024-05-29.

  2. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 10 de diciembre de 2024

    Troutman v. State

    S24A1163

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato con malicia de un hombre del condado de DeKalb que apuñaló a muerte a su examigo, al considerar que la evidencia era suficiente y rechazar los reclamos de que los errores de su abogado de juicio le negaron un juicio justo.

    The evidence at trial showed the following. Troutman, a 21- year-old high school student, and Clemons, a student at DeVry University, were friends. But their friendship deteriorated when Clemons and a mutual friend whom Troutman had dated, Marlana Ackey, created a fake Facebook profile featuring naked photos of Troutman. Troutman thereafter threatened...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Troutman v. State (S24A1163), decided 2024-12-10.

    A cell phone associated with Troutman did not make or receive any phone calls or send or receive any texts on January 22, 23, or 24, 2014, and the phone’s location during that time could not be determined. Troutman’s MARTA card records and surveillance photos show that on January 24 Troutman arrived at the Avondale MARTA station at 4:21 p.m. and exited from...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Troutman v. State (S24A1163), decided 2024-12-10.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  3. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 10 de diciembre de 2024

    Sharkey v. State

    S24A1096

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato y robo a mano armada de un hombre del condado de Clayton, al hallar pruebas contundentes de culpabilidad y determinar que excluir la identificación fotográfica inconsistente de un niño pequeño fue un error inofensivo.

    Janaille testified that Barker’s phone records showed that, at 1:27 p.m. on the day of the shooting, Barker’s phone placed a call to a St. Louis, Missouri phone number, which Moore identified as Appellant’s. Leonard testified that, later that afternoon, around 2:00, he called Appellant and spoke with him over the phone. And according to Janaille, Barker’s...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Sharkey v. State (S24A1096), decided 2024-12-10.

    Mickles testified that she heard gunshots while inside her house, and shortly thereafter she ran to her front door, where she found J. H. and R. W. According to Mickles, she then went inside the girls’ duplex, where she saw D. B. sitting on the couch and Barker lying on the kitchen floor.3 Mickles said that, after seeing blood around Barker’s head, she took...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Sharkey v. State (S24A1096), decided 2024-12-10.

  4. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 11 de junio de 2024

    Eleby v. State

    S24A0129

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas relacionadas con asesinato de un hombre del condado de Lamar por una invasión de hogar mortal, pero ordenó anular sus condenas por robo a mano armada y conspiración porque debieron fusionarse con otras condenas.

    Although a .22-caliber bullet was recovered from Bussey’s leg, the handgun used in the crimes was never recovered. GBI Agent Cayce Ingalls testified about text messages that Appellant and Spinks sent to each other from December 4 to 5, 2010. For example, at 4:37 p.m. on December 4, Spinks sent Appellant a text message saying that he would “be over” and that...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Eleby v. State (S24A0129), decided 2024-06-11.

    The State also offered evidence that Spinks texted Smith at 1:55 a.m. on December 5, asking him if he “want[ed] to hit a lick.” Smith asked, “where about and what’s it worth.” Spinks replied that “it’s [the] college boys,” and Smith said that he lived “right by” them, that he watched them, that there “ain’t none in there worth all that.” Smith added that...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Eleby v. State (S24A0129), decided 2024-06-11.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  5. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 11 de junio de 2024

    Tatum v. State

    S23G0955

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia resolvió que los tribunales que apliquen la doctrina de la fuente independiente deben decidir si la policía decidió solicitar una orden de registro debido a un registro ilegal anterior, y no solo si la solicitud de la orden tenía suficiente evidencia por sí sola.

    Evidence from Deputy Townsend’s testimony, his body-worn camera, and the parties’ stipulations was largely consistent and shows the following. On July 15, 2018, at 10:34 p.m.,5 the Madison County 911 call center received a call regarding an unknown 5 The parties jointly stipulated that the call was received at 10:34 p.m., but the warrant affidavit states...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Tatum v. State (S23G0955), decided 2024-06-11.

    Deputy Townsend asked if Appellant would show him the last photograph he had taken. Appellant initially declined, but after Deputy Townsend told Appellant that he could detain him and obtain a search warrant, Appellant agreed. As Appellant was pulling up the gallery of photographs on his phone, he tilted his phone away from the deputy, preventing the deputy...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Tatum v. State (S23G0955), decided 2024-06-11.

  6. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de enero de 2024

    Adams v. State

    S23A1207

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Fulton por un tiroteo mortal desde un vehículo en movimiento, rechazando sus alegaciones de que la evidencia era demasiado débil, que debía suprimirse la evidencia encontrada en su casa, y que su abogado tenía un conflicto de intereses por representarlo junto con su hermano.

    When the police arrived at the nightclub, Ward showed them the video recordings from the nightclub’s security cameras. As Ward looked at the recordings with the officers, he identified Pitts and the Adams brothers getting into a white Ford Escape that matched the description of the car Dobson said had followed her and Lowe. Isaiah got into the driver’s...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Adams v. State (S23A1207), decided 2024-01-17.

    On August 22, 2016, the police went to the Adams home to execute an arrest warrant for Leon, who, unrelated to the shooting, had violated the terms of his probation. Officers knocked at the front door, and a woman permitted them to enter. When they showed the woman the warrant, she claimed nobody else was in the residence. But then Xavier Adams — Isaiah’s...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Adams v. State (S23A1207), decided 2024-01-17.

    4 pasajes más en este documento

  7. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 31 de octubre de 2024

    WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL

    S24A0591

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó una ley estatal que tipifica como delito perturbar las sesiones y reuniones de la Asamblea General, y rechazó los argumentos de que la ley es inconstitucionalmente vaga o tan amplia que abarca expresión protegida.

    PETERSON, Presiding Justice, concurring. I concur fully in the Court’s opinion affirming the trial court’s rejection of the appellants’ state constitutional challenge to a Georgia statute regulating conduct at the Georgia State Capitol and related locations. The appellants are limited on appeal to only those arguments that they chose to make below, and they...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL (S24A0591), decided 2024-10-31. Concurrence: PETERSON, Presiding Justice, concurring.

    1. The statute is seriously flawed. I concur fully in the Court’s decision today that OCGA § 16-11- 34.1 does not criminalize so much protected speech and expressive conduct relative to its constitutionally permissible applications that it must be struck down as overbroad under State v. Fielden, 280 Ga. 444 (629 SE2d 252) (2006). But it is nevertheless...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL (S24A0591), decided 2024-10-31. Concurrence: PETERSON, Presiding Justice, concurring. 1. The statute is seriously flawed..

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  8. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de septiembre de 2024

    Pyne v. State

    S24A0670

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Jacob Pyne en la muerte a tiros de Gerard Foster, rechazando los argumentos de que su abogado de juicio fue ineficaz y de que el alegato final del fiscal trasladó indebidamente la carga de la prueba.

    Later on July 6, law enforcement officers located K. C.’s Impala at a residence connected to Demarcus White, a friend of Pyne’s, and they towed the vehicle to department headquarters. After obtaining a search warrant and conducting a search of the vehicle, law enforcement officers located Pyne’s cell phone and a credit card in his name inside the vehicle....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Pyne v. State (S24A0670), decided 2024-09-17.

    After the trial court swore the jury in, the trial court gave the jury preliminary instructions, which included the following: (1) “[t]he defendant is presumed innocent until he is proven guilty”; (2) “[t]he defendant enters upon the trial of the case with a presumption of innocence in his favor,” which “remains with the defendant until it is overcome by...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Pyne v. State (S24A0670), decided 2024-09-17.

  9. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 14 de marzo de 2024

    Andre Pugh v. State

    S23A1063

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Andre Pugh por matar a su esposa, dictaminando que la orden de registro del teléfono celular usada en su contra era válida y que sus abogados no fueron ineficaces en la forma en que la impugnaron.

    PINSON, Justice, concurring. I concur fully in the Court’s opinion. Relevant to Division 2 (d) of that opinion, I want to flag one important point about the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement as applied to search warrants for cell phones, because it’s going to come up again and again. In State v. Wilson, 315 Ga. 613 (884 SE2d 298) (2023), we held...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Andre Pugh v. State (S23A1063), decided 2024-03-14. Concurrence: PINSON, Justice, concurring.

    phone necessarily must list each specific kind or category of data the police may look through when they search the phone’s contents. Just as specifying the address of a home can be particular enough to allow police to search rooms, closets, and cabinets throughout the home, identifying a specific cell phone as the “place to be searched” may well be...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Andre Pugh v. State (S23A1063), decided 2024-03-14. Concurrence: PINSON, Justice, concurring.

    4 pasajes más en este documento

  10. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2024

    Pinkins v. State

    S24A0716

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Gwinnett, dictaminando que la evidencia respaldaba una conclusión de malicia y que juzgar juntos los cargos relacionados con ambas víctimas fue correcto.

    1. The trial evidence showed the following. Appellant and Clay met and started dating in 2014. At some point during that year, Clay became pregnant with Appellant’s child. And in late 2014, Clay and her son from a prior relationship moved in with Loving, whom Clay described in her testimony as an older woman, a motherly figure, and a friend. Appellant...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Pinkins v. State (S24A0716), decided 2024-08-13.

    After the domestic-violence incident, Appellant and Clay continued to stay in contact due to their son. But Clay testified that Appellant would frequently show up wherever she was without invitation. On November 13, 2018, Clay invited a male friend to come over to her apartment in the evening. When she heard a knock, she opened the door expecting to greet...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Pinkins v. State (S24A0716), decided 2024-08-13.

  11. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 30 de abril de 2024

    Ward v. State

    S24A0352

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato en la comisión de un delito grave y cargos relacionados de un hombre del condado de Paulding, rechazando sus argumentos de que el jurado debió considerar la opción de homicidio voluntario, de que su condena por el segundo tiroteo era legalmente inconsistente, y de que su abogado fue ineficaz.

    Law enforcement officers learned that Ward was driving a black Ford Explorer with New York plates on the night of the shooting. During the early morning hours of March 25, law enforcement officers located Ward and co-defendant Brooks at the home of Shayla George, and Ward was arrested and taken into custody.9 While he was in custody, Ward was swabbed for...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ward v. State (S24A0352), decided 2024-04-30.

    10 Mason testified that she spoke to Brooks by phone on the night of the shootings, and she told him to park the Pathfinder in the garage at George’s house because it was “linked” to Mason as the renter of the vehicle. On March 30, 2021, law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Ward’s residence and located Ward’s cell phone. Law enforcement...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ward v. State (S24A0352), decided 2024-04-30.

    2 pasajes más en este documento

  12. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de enero de 2024

    Williams v. State

    S23A1159

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Chatham por un tiroteo en un club nocturno, y determinó que cualquier error al admitir pruebas de teléfono celular y un video de demostración fue inofensivo dada la fuerte evidencia en su contra.

    1. Williams argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his cell phone. Assuming without deciding that the admission of this evidence was error, we conclude that any error was harmless. As established at a pre-trial hearing, Detective Jason Manley proceeded to Charietta’s home on the day of the shooting....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Williams v. State (S23A1159), decided 2024-01-17.

    Later, police obtained a passcode for the phone from Charietta. Williams filed a motion to suppress evidence gathered from the search of his phone, arguing that police illegally seized the phone without a search warrant or probable cause, and illegally searched his phone when they “without [a] warrant or probable cause deputized [Charietta] as [an] agent of...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Williams v. State (S23A1159), decided 2024-01-17.

    2 pasajes más en este documento

  13. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 22 de octubre de 2024

    CAMPBELL v. THE STATE (Four Cases)

    S24A0578, S24A0580, S24A0581, S24A1180

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato y pandillerismo de cuatro hombres del condado de Chatham, al determinar que, aunque el tribunal de primera instancia cometió un par de errores al admitir pruebas e instruir al jurado, esos errores no afectaron los veredictos.

    In April 2016, Jay Buchans, who shared a cell with Parrish, talked to Sergeant Santoro about statements Parrish made to him regarding Foley’s murder.7 Buchans said that Parrish told him the following. There were “three or four of them” driving around in the car, including “their driver and [Parrish’s] stepbrother,” Campbell. 8 “[T]hey had a pistol” and were...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, CAMPBELL v. THE STATE (Four Cases) (S24A0578, S24A0580, S24A0581, S24A1180), decided 2024-10-22. (b) Foley’s Murder.

    Sergeant Santoro testified about maps created based on records showing which cell phone towers Campbell’s and Parrish’s phones were connected to on the day of the murder. The records showed that at around 6:03 p.m., Campbell’s and Parrish’s phones were both in the area that was served by the same cell phone tower as Parrish’s house.10 At 6:16 p.m.,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, CAMPBELL v. THE STATE (Four Cases) (S24A0578, S24A0580, S24A0581, S24A1180), decided 2024-10-22. (b) Foley’s Murder.

    5 pasajes más en este documento

  14. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 2 de julio de 2024

    Grant v. State

    S24A0843

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato durante la comisión de un delito grave de una mujer del condado de Chatham, dictaminando que la evidencia circunstancial que la vinculaba con el hombre que mató a un apostador que acababa de ganar miles de dólares era legalmente suficiente.

    Shawntray’s body was found lying next to his vehicle in the parking lot of his apartment complex. He had suffered multiple gunshot wounds and was pronounced dead at the scene. Police recovered five shell casings and several spent bullets from around Shawntray’s body, as well as Shawntray’s empty wallet. Shawntray’s Springfield XD 9mm handgun was also...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Grant v. State (S24A0843), decided 2024-07-02.

    The evidence also showed that Grant concealed information from police officers and, at times, affirmatively misled them. Although Grant asserts that she merely “declined to reveal the communications” with Dunham to police, the evidence at trial showed that she went beyond simply concealing the communications. Besides the deletion of her communications with...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Grant v. State (S24A0843), decided 2024-07-02.

  15. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2024

    Bowman v. State

    S24A0642

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Polk por matar a su ex prometida, rechazando los reclamos de que su abogado de juicio fue ineficaz y determinando que cualquier error al admitir pruebas de su violencia pasada contra una ex esposa fue inofensivo.

    (e) Next, Bowman argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to introduce evidence and elicit testimony about cell phone records that Bowman claims would show that he and Wolfe had a good relationship leading up to Wolfe’s death, despite evidence that the two had a volatile relationship previously. First, Bowman argues that counsel should have called a...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Bowman v. State (S24A0642), decided 2024-08-13.

    We conclude that Bowman has failed to show that counsel was deficient in failing to call a “cell phone expert” to give testimony as Bowman describes above or to produce the cell phone records. At the motion-for-new-trial hearing, counsel testified that the State’s expert in cell phone forensics had “admitted everything [that counsel] asked him to admit” on...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Bowman v. State (S24A0642), decided 2024-08-13.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  16. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024

    Rana v. State

    S24A0705

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un oficial de policía del condado de Fulton por matar a una mujer a la que había solicitado para tener sexo, rechazando sus alegatos de que el juez de primera instancia dio instrucciones defectuosas al jurado sobre accidente, defensa propia y defensa del hogar.

    Agent Josh Ellis of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, a crime scene specialist, arrived at the crime scene about 6:30 p.m. on August 22. Agent Ellis testified that he located a .40-caliber shell casing at the crime scene. He also found a $20 bill in Woodard’s pants pocket and testified that Woodard had a significant head injury. Woodard, who was five...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Rana v. State (S24A0705), decided 2024-10-15.

    On the morning of August 27, 2014, Appellant was stopped by City of Hapeville law enforcement officials for a traffic violation. A detective told him that he had been stopped for a “tag violation” and that the detective was interested in talking to him about a homicide because Appellant’s “phone number had been identified as a last known contact of...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Rana v. State (S24A0705), decided 2024-10-15.

  17. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024

    Wallace v. State

    S24A0422

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato en el marco de un delito grave de David Wallace en un tiroteo entre pandillas en el condado de Fulton, rechazando los argumentos de que la evidencia era demasiado débil, que sujetarlo con un grillete en el juicio fue injusto y que su abogado fue ineficaz.

    Police arrested Appellant the next week. Officer Daniel Burnett of the Atlanta Police Department testified that on June 21, 2014, he and other uniformed police officers conducted a routine patrol using a marked police vehicle in an area near the intersection of Sells Avenue and Legacy Drive. The officers turned into a restaurant parking lot; immediately, a...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Wallace v. State (S24A0422), decided 2024-10-15.

    Detective Tyrone Dennis testified for the State as an expert in gangs, as mentioned above. As a general matter, Detective Dennis explained that Bloods members used the color red, five-pointed stars, and red tattoos to identify themselves. Furthermore, Detective Dennis explained to the jury that older members of gangs are called “OGs,” short for “original...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Wallace v. State (S24A0422), decided 2024-10-15.

    3 pasajes más en este documento

  18. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024

    Siders v. State

    S24A0607

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre en un homicidio durante una invasión a un hogar relacionada con drogas, rechazando sus alegatos sobre pruebas insuficientes, publicaciones de redes sociales admitidas indebidamente e instrucciones al jurado.

    Detective Scott Demeester, who was qualified as an expert in cell phone data interpretation and cell-site analysis, testified regarding data recovered from the defendants’ cell phones. A cell phone associated with Washington2 called and texted Jackson’s cell phone several times in the days leading up to the shooting. When Washington called Jackson around...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Siders v. State (S24A0607), decided 2024-10-15.

    Additional hotel surveillance video showed that the Pontiac entered the Best Western parking lot at 6:20 a.m. on the day after the shooting. Although the video did not show who exited the car, it did show three men unload what appeared to be heavy bags from the Pontiac. At 8:01 a.m., the three men returned to the car and left the hotel. The car then...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Siders v. State (S24A0607), decided 2024-10-15.

    2 pasajes más en este documento

  19. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 6 de febrero de 2024

    Rashad v. State

    S23A0864

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Floyd por matar al hijo de dos años de su novia, y determinó que la evidencia fue suficiente para el jurado y que las decisiones de su abogado defensor no fueron constitucionalmente deficientes.

    (i) April 12, 2018 On the morning of April 12, Sydney, taking Adrian with her, dropped L. D. off at school and then ran errands with Adrian. After Sydney and Adrian returned home, she cleaned the house and he ran around. At one point, Adrian knocked a TV onto himself. Sydney picked him up, and after he “wiggl[ed] to get back down,” she set him down and he...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Rashad v. State (S23A0864), decided 2024-02-06. (i) April 12, 2018.

    Early in the morning at about 6:00 a.m., after Sydney texted Rashad to ask if he was up, he texted: “I hope this boy is okay [ ]b/c he acted like his [sic] is so sleepy.” Sydney texted back that she was worried about Adrian. At about 6:50 a.m., as she was getting off work, she and Rashad spoke on the phone, and Rashad told her that Adrian had a seizure. In...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Rashad v. State (S23A0864), decided 2024-02-06. (i) April 12, 2018.

    2 pasajes más en este documento

  20. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 29 de mayo de 2024

    Jones v. State

    S24A0351

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato en el curso de un delito grave de un hombre del condado de DeKalb por la muerte a golpes de una mujer a quien había acordado pagar por sexo, y rechazó los cuestionamientos a la evidencia, su decisión de no testificar y su cadena perpetua.

    Sergeant M. S. McLendon of the DeKalb County Police Department testified that he obtained a search warrant for Parke’s car and inspected her cell phone. He found the last phone number that Parke’s phone contacted, discovered that the phone number belonged to Appellant, and found Appellant’s address, which was next door to the crime scene. Sergeant McLendon...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Jones v. State (S24A0351), decided 2024-05-29.

    1The crime occurred on May 12, 2015. On July 30, 2015, a DeKalb County grand jury indicted Appellant for malice murder, felony murder, and aggravated assault. At a trial from August 29 to September 2, 2016, the jury found Appellant not guilty of malice murder but guilty of felony murder and aggravated assault. The trial court sentenced Appellant to serve...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Jones v. State (S24A0351), decided 2024-05-29.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

Afinar los resultados

Los números cuentan los documentos que encontró esta búsqueda.

Año

Los resultados se ordenan con los modelos de representación y reordenamiento de Voyage AI. Ningún modelo escribe el texto que usted ve en un resultado: cada pasaje se cita de un documento guardado, y los resúmenes escritos por Georgia Commons están identificados como tales.

Legible por máquinas https://georgiacommons.org/search.md?q=cell+phones+in+school · https://georgiacommons.org/index.md · MCP https://mcp.georgiacommons.org/mcp