Georgia CommonsComité Rules de la Cámara de Representantes
Comité Rules de la Cámara de Representantes, 25 de marzo de 2026
2025-2026 Regular Session · 341 CAP · 43 min
Esta es una transcripción automática del video de la Asamblea General, hecha por un modelo de reconocimiento de voz. No es un registro oficial y puede entender mal palabras, nombres y números. No se identifica a quienes hablan. El video es el registro: cada marca de tiempo enlaza al momento en que se reproduce.
El video es de la Asamblea General y se reproduce desde su canal de Vimeo. Seleccione cualquier tiempo de abajo para reproducir ese momento. Ver en el canal de Vimeo de la Asamblea General · Agenda
Resumen
Escrito por un modelo de IA (gpt-6.1-sol) a partir de la transcripción. No forma parte del registro, y el video es lo que se dijo.
El comité incluyó ocho medidas en el calendario del día de la Cámara de Representantes de Georgia, entre ellas SB 306, tras aprobar un texto sustitutivo sobre créditos fiscales para viviendas de bajos ingresos. Los miembros preguntaron si ese texto sustitutivo aclaraba los límites existentes o cambiaba sustancialmente el monto de los créditos disponibles. El texto sustitutivo se aprobó mediante votación a viva voz, con oposición. El comité también devolvió SB 382 al Comité de Medios y Arbitrios sin objeciones. Los miembros escucharon solicitudes para dar curso a SB 594, sobre fraude de identidad digital, y a SB 89, que el miembro que lo solicitó describió como una medida que permitiría a las licorerías vender bebidas con cannabis. Ninguno de los dos se sometió a votación para su inclusión en el calendario durante esta reunión.
Proyectos de ley tratados (11)
Cada relato abarca el tramo de la reunión que indica. El número del proyecto de ley se dice en ese tramo, salvo cuando era el único proyecto en la agenda de un comité.
SB 594. Internet and E-mail Fraud; the criminal offense of digital identity fraud; establish
Desde 0:33:52 · turnos 7 a 9 · Confirmado por el 2026 House Journal, p. 3209
El patrocinador del proyecto de ley dijo que SB 594 crearía el delito de fraude de identidad digital para que los fiscales pudieran procesar a las personas que roban la identidad de alguien en línea y recaudan dinero usando el nombre de esa persona. No hubo preguntas y el comité no realizó ninguna votación.
SB 89. Income Taxes; amount of a tax credit based on the federal tax credit for certain child and dependent care expenses; increase
Desde 0:35:01 · turnos 14 a 18
Un miembro del comité solicitó que se diera curso a SB 89 y lo describió como una medida que permitiría a las licorerías vender bebidas con cannabis. El miembro argumentó que las licorerías eran un lugar apropiado porque verifican la identificación y los productos estaban restringidos a personas de 21 años o más. Otro miembro preguntó si las ventas se ajustarían a cualquier prohibición o excepción federal. El miembro que hizo la solicitud dijo que solo podrían venderse productos legales a nivel federal y que el Congreso había establecido una fecha límite prevista para septiembre u octubre, a menos que el Congreso cambiara de rumbo. El comité no realizó ninguna votación.
SB 306. Bona Fide Conservation Use Property; impending expiration to be sent via certified mail; require notices
Desde 0:36:49 · turnos 24 a 69
Un miembro presentó el texto sustitutivo LC443555S para SB 306 y dijo que el sector de viviendas de bajos ingresos había solicitado un lenguaje más claro sobre los créditos fiscales. Quien lo presentó dijo que el texto sustitutivo reemplazaría el lenguaje sobre créditos permitidos por lenguaje sobre créditos otorgados inicialmente y aclararía el tratamiento para cada año fiscal. En respuesta a las preguntas, explicó que el Department of Community Affairs otorga créditos que abarcan 10 años y dijo que el texto sustitutivo no cambiaría los límites. Otro miembro preguntó si el lenguaje permitía $100 million anuales, o hasta $1 billion a lo largo de 10 años, y cuestionó si eliminar el lenguaje sobre un monto anual total representaba un cambio sustancial. Quien presentó el texto dijo que esos montos podrían otorgarse, pero que tal vez no todos se harían efectivos porque a veces los proyectos no se construyen o no cumplen con los requisitos federales de arrendamiento. Mantuvo que el otorgamiento anual reflejaba la intención original. El comité aprobó el texto sustitutivo mediante votación a viva voz, en la que se escuchó oposición y no se indicó un recuento. Más tarde, el comité incluyó el proyecto de ley con el texto sustitutivo en el calendario del día sin objeciones.
SB 382. Ad Valorem Taxation; make the state-wide base year homestead exemption mandatory for all political subdivisions
Desde 0:40:58 · turnos 49 a 51
Un miembro del comité presentó una moción para devolver SB 382 al Comité de Medios y Arbitrios. Otro miembro secundó la moción y la presidencia anunció la remisión sin objeciones. No se discutió el contenido del proyecto de ley.
SB 433. "Rio's Law"
Desde 0:41:28 · turnos 52 a 54
El comité incluyó SB 433 en el calendario del día sin objeciones, tras una moción que fue secundada. No se discutió el contenido del proyecto de ley.
SB 503. Insurance; rental home marketplace guarantees from the definition of property insurance; exempt
Desde 0:41:36 · turnos 54 a 57
El comité incluyó SB 503 en el calendario del día sin objeciones, tras una moción que fue secundada. No se discutió el contenido del proyecto de ley.
SB 547. Offenses of Pimping and Pandering; modify the penalties
Desde 0:41:44 · turnos 57 a 60
El comité incluyó SB 547 en el calendario del día sin objeciones, tras una moción que fue secundada. No se discutió el contenido del proyecto de ley.
SB 587. Offenses Against Public Health and Morals; the establishment of an animal cruelty database; provide
Desde 0:41:52 · turnos 60 a 63
El comité incluyó SB 587 en el calendario del día sin objeciones, tras una moción que fue secundada. No se discutió el contenido del proyecto de ley.
SR 622. Joint Study Committee on Evaluating Escalating Costs in Georgia's Foster Care System; create
Desde 0:42:02 · turnos 63 a 66
El comité incluyó SR 622 en el calendario del día sin objeciones, tras una moción que fue secundada. No se discutió el contenido de la resolución.
SB 430. Taxes; certain military museums qualify as destination marketing organizations and private sector nonprofit organizations; provide
Desde 0:42:26 · turnos 69 a 72
El comité incluyó SB 430 en el calendario del día sin objeciones, tras una moción que fue secundada. No se discutió el contenido del proyecto de ley.
SB 446. Student Scholarship Organizations; State of Georgia to participate in the federal tax credit program for contributions of individuals to scholarship granting organizations; provide
Desde 0:42:34 · turnos 72 a 76
Tras una moción que fue secundada, la presidencia anunció que SB 446 estaba en el calendario del día. No se discutió el contenido del proyecto de ley.
Registros oficiales de esta reunión
Transcripción
77 turnos. Seleccione un tiempo para reproducir ese momento del video.
- 0:31:58
Morning, everybody.
- 0:32:06
Morning. We'll call our meeting to order, and, uh, we'll begin our meeting this morning. We will recognize, uh, Representative, uh, Al Williams to open us up with a word of prayer, please.
- 0:32:18
Let us pray. We thank you, our Heavenly Father, as we enter the final days of this session. We thank you for the blessings that you have bestowed upon us, and we ask for your continued blessings. Bless those that are here, bless those that are not here. For it is in Jesus' name we pray, amen.
- 0:32:36
Amen. Thank you, Representative Williams. Um,
- 0:32:44
okay, we'll, just as a little bit of information to members on the wall or those that'll be asking, if you've already asked for a bill or a resolution or a study committee, you only have to ask one time. If you've already asked for the bill, you don't have to come back and be present to ask for it again. And yesterday was a committee day, and there were about 30 bills that were passed out of committee yesterday, but they've not been reported out of the committee as of right now.
- 0:33:19
Uh, but they will be reported today after the clerk makes his, uh, reports on the committees after the preacher of the day. If, if we have a supplemental calendar today, they would be eligible. But if it's not reported out, it will not be on the yellow sheet or the blue sheet. Okay? All right. Senator
- 0:33:45
Byrd.
- 0:33:45
Thank you, Mr. Chairman and committee members. I'll be brief since I'm the only one on the wall. Uh, page four, fourth one down, Senate Bill 594, all this bill does is create a new offense of digital identity fraud, make sure our prosecute, prosecutors have a way to go after those that steal identity online and try to go out and raise money off someone else's name.
- 0:34:08
Okay. 594. Don't see any questions. Thank you, Senator.
- 0:34:11
Thank y'all. Y'all have a good day.
- 0:34:12
Okay. Representative Vance Smith is recognized for an announcement.
- 0:34:20
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, I know I'm not a member of the Rules Committee, but I feel like I am. Uh, I want to recognize somebody from home, if Ms. Rachel Crumbley would stand up in the corner back here. Great friend of the family, great citizen from Harris County, and she's visiting us today, so.
- 0:34:35
Great.
- 0:34:41
Welcome. Glad to have you visiting with us today. Okay, any committee members wish to ask for a bill? Okay. All right, at this time ... Excuse me, I'm sorry. Representative Powell?
- 0:34:59
I'd like to ask for Senate Bill 89. This'll, this would allow the, uh, alcohol stores, uh, liquor stores to sell the cannabis drinks since those are age appropriate at 21, and they're being sold everywhere else. And I think the most proper place would be the liquor stores that check IDs.
- 0:35:21
Okay. Have a question. Pro Tem.
- 0:35:25
Thank you. Mr. Chairman, is it not true that if this bill does take into account that if th- if Congress bans them, then we would obviously, um, comport with whatever's federal law, but if they make exceptions, we would also comport with that?
- 0:35:44
Exactly right. When Congress, uh, they did the CR back in the fall, they basically put a shutoff date under the Farm Act. Uh, they're supposed to go out in, I believe, September or October or something this year. This would allow to sell these, but they essentially check IDs. If Congress rescinds that and puts them back into place, then they'll still be able to sell them. Whatever's a legal product is what it is.
- 0:36:09
Yeah. Thank you.
- 0:36:14
Okay. Chair Lady Cooper?
- 0:36:15
Um, yes, sir. Is it all right for us to ask for a bill if it's not ours?
- 0:36:19
No.
- 0:36:20
Oh, no. Okay.
- 0:36:24
Chairman Hawkins, do you ... Okay. Good. Thank you. Okay, now I'm gonna recognize, uh, Chairman, uh, um, Carson to speak to a proposition he has.
- 0:36:41
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members of the committee. Um, I have, uh, laid on your, on your, um, at your desk a substitute for Senate Bill 306. This is LC443555S. The only change here is on lines, uh, uh, 113 to 118. This is a r- a request from our friends in the low-income housing, uh, industry in regard to some, um, more clear language in regard to how these credits are awarded. This is an update that was made just actually this past Friday in the IRC Conformity Bill.
- 0:37:14
This is a update requested by industry in regard to being very clear about tax credits awarded rather than allowed.
- 0:37:23
Okay. You- you've heard the explanation. Any questions on that?
- 0:37:26
I'll take a question.
- 0:37:28
Got a question. Go ahead.
- 0:37:30
Can you just explain exactly what the practical implication will be there?
- 0:37:34
Chairman Carson?
- 0:37:35
Sure. So this was, uh, language, th- the, the language that we're changing that is currently in code after the governor's signature of House Bill 1199, uh, that was, uh, language, uh, initially suggested by our friends at Department of Community Affairs. You see the word allowed. What we're doing is we're changing that-
- 0:37:53
On which line?
- 0:37:54
I'm sorry, uh, 116
- 0:37:59
You see the word allowed?
- 0:38:02
Okay.
- 0:38:02
So what we're doing is we're changing that to initially awarded in regard to the LIHTC, the Low Income Housing Tax Credit awards coming out of DCA, which are awarded for a first year for a 10-year period. These streams of credits go for 10 years. It's not just a one and done like a Georgia historic credit or adoption credit or what have you. So we're being very clear that what DCA is awarding for each year of that 10-year period. Uh, and again, on line, uh, 117, they wanted some additional clarifying language for each of the taxable years.
- 0:38:33
This doesn't change the caps. It just makes it more clear for industry.
- 0:38:37
Is this language we've seen in Ways and Means before?
- 0:38:40
It is, is my knowledge, uh, it's been made aware to the chairman of the committee and several others, yes.
- 0:38:50
Okay, you got a question, Chairman Martin?
- 0:38:54
Uh, yes, sir. To, to the gentleman, um, you, you're, uh, you addressed allowed versus initially awarded. Um, you addressed the, each taxable year. So I- am I to understand that this would allow $100 million per year, so over a 10-year period, that would be up to a billion dollars in credit?
- 0:39:12
That would be what is, uh, awarded, but rarely does that, uh, amount ever take effect because what happens in the industry is these initial awards will go out, and then sometimes the projects are not built, sometimes the projects are not leased up properly in regard to the, uh, the federal law that governs these, uh, developments and so forth.
- 0:39:34
And if I could just follow up then, then the further question I got is the big change in the, the language seems to be the s- the second word that's stricken, aggregate annual amount. Is, uh, you're, you're ta- This seems to change that, that the aggregate total c- is going from 100 million to 100 million per year, which is a substantial change. Is that not true?
- 0:39:55
Well, that was the original intent, is my understanding, um, both with, uh, DCA and the chairman and, um, uh, industry. What this does is makes it very clear in regard to the awards coming out from DCA, yes, sir.
- 0:40:11
Okay. Don't, don't see any other questions. Is there a motion to approve the rule substitute to Senate Bill 306, LC 443555S? Have a motion and a second. Any opposition?
- 0:40:30
Have opposition. All those in favor say, "Aye." Aye. Those opposed, "No." No. It's approved. Okay. Now, let's set a calendar for today under modified structure.
- 0:40:49
Oh, I need to do my motion.
- 0:40:50
Um, excuse me. I'm getting ahead of myself. Okay, recognize, uh, Trey Kelley, Representative Kelley.
- 0:40:55
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh, I move that Senate Bill 382 be recommitted to the Ways and Means Committee.
- 0:41:02
Second.
- 0:41:03
Okay. Have a motion that 382 go back to Ways and Means. Any opposition? It's back in Ways and Means. Okay.
- 0:41:21
Okay, now we'll set the calendar for today. Under modified structure, Senate Bill 433.
- 0:41:30
Move.
- 0:41:30
Have a move and a second. Any opposition? It's on. Senate Bill 503.
- 0:41:38
Move.
- 0:41:39
Second.
- 0:41:39
Move and second. Any opposition? It's on. Senate Bill 547.
- 0:41:46
Move.
- 0:41:47
Second.
- 0:41:48
Moved and second. Any opposition? It's on. Senate Bill 587.
- 0:41:54
Move.
- 0:41:55
Second.
- 0:41:56
Moved and second. Any opposition? It's on. Senate Resolution, Senate Resolution 622.
- 0:42:05
Move.
- 0:42:05
Second.
- 0:42:06
Moved and second. Any opposition? It's on. Okay, now under structured, Senate Bill 306 by Substitute LC 443555S.
- 0:42:20
Move.
- 0:42:21
Move.
- 0:42:21
Have a move and second. Any opposition? It's on. Senate Bill 430.
- 0:42:29
Move.
- 0:42:29
Second.
- 0:42:29
Moved and second. Any opposition? It's on. Senate Bill 446.
- 0:42:37
Move.
- 0:42:37
Moved and second.
- 0:42:38
Second.
- 0:42:39
It's on. Okay, that, uh, takes care of our calendar to begin with today. Uh, we will probably be meeting with you a little bit later in the day, so, uh, sort of hang around, okay? Thank y'all. We're adjourned.