Ir al contenido
Georgia Commons
Menú

Buscar en todas las colecciones

Buscar en Georgia Commons

Proyectos de ley, opiniones de la Corte Suprema, el Código y las dos constituciones, y transcripciones de las reuniones de la Cámara y el Senado, en una sola búsqueda. Pregunte con palabras sencillas: la búsqueda ordena los pasajes por su significado y también por sus palabras.

Los documentos están en inglés, así que una búsqueda en inglés encuentra más.

Filtros:2024 Quitar filtros

Se encontraron 64 documentos.

  1. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 29 de mayo de 2024

    Baker v. State

    S24A0478

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas de Kenneth Lee Baker por asesinato en las muertes de su esposa y su hijastra, rechazando sus argumentos de que las pruebas eran demasiado débiles y de que el juez de primera instancia debió haber dado una instrucción especial al jurado y excluido ciertas fotos y un cuaderno.

    K. B. testified that on May 16, 2010, he and his mother had spent the night at his aunt’s home in College Park. At 5:39 a.m. on May 17, 2010, Lynnale sent Baker’s cell phone a sexually suggestive text message, apparently intended for someone else. Lynnale dropped K. B. off at school and proceeded to the Griffin residence to see Shaelinda, according to K. B....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Baker v. State (S24A0478), decided 2024-05-29.

    Pursuant to a consent-to-search form signed by Baker, law enforcement searched Baker’s truck and found divorce papers and a notebook. The first page in the notebook began with the statement, “My name is Kenneth Lee Baker,” and included Baker’s address and names and some contact information for various people, including Baker’s father and children. The...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Baker v. State (S24A0478), decided 2024-05-29.

  2. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 11 de junio de 2024

    Tatum v. State

    S23G0955

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia resolvió que los tribunales que apliquen la doctrina de la fuente independiente deben decidir si la policía decidió solicitar una orden de registro debido a un registro ilegal anterior, y no solo si la solicitud de la orden tenía suficiente evidencia por sí sola.

    Evidence from Deputy Townsend’s testimony, his body-worn camera, and the parties’ stipulations was largely consistent and shows the following. On July 15, 2018, at 10:34 p.m.,5 the Madison County 911 call center received a call regarding an unknown 5 The parties jointly stipulated that the call was received at 10:34 p.m., but the warrant affidavit states...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Tatum v. State (S23G0955), decided 2024-06-11.

    Deputy Townsend asked if Appellant would show him the last photograph he had taken. Appellant initially declined, but after Deputy Townsend told Appellant that he could detain him and obtain a search warrant, Appellant agreed. As Appellant was pulling up the gallery of photographs on his phone, he tilted his phone away from the deputy, preventing the deputy...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Tatum v. State (S23G0955), decided 2024-06-11.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  3. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 10 de diciembre de 2024

    Troutman v. State

    S24A1163

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato con malicia de un hombre del condado de DeKalb que apuñaló a muerte a su examigo, al considerar que la evidencia era suficiente y rechazar los reclamos de que los errores de su abogado de juicio le negaron un juicio justo.

    The evidence at trial showed the following. Troutman, a 21- year-old high school student, and Clemons, a student at DeVry University, were friends. But their friendship deteriorated when Clemons and a mutual friend whom Troutman had dated, Marlana Ackey, created a fake Facebook profile featuring naked photos of Troutman. Troutman thereafter threatened...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Troutman v. State (S24A1163), decided 2024-12-10.

    A cell phone associated with Troutman did not make or receive any phone calls or send or receive any texts on January 22, 23, or 24, 2014, and the phone’s location during that time could not be determined. Troutman’s MARTA card records and surveillance photos show that on January 24 Troutman arrived at the Avondale MARTA station at 4:21 p.m. and exited from...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Troutman v. State (S24A1163), decided 2024-12-10.

  4. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 11 de junio de 2024

    Eleby v. State

    S24A0129

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas relacionadas con asesinato de un hombre del condado de Lamar por una invasión de hogar mortal, pero ordenó anular sus condenas por robo a mano armada y conspiración porque debieron fusionarse con otras condenas.

    Although a .22-caliber bullet was recovered from Bussey’s leg, the handgun used in the crimes was never recovered. GBI Agent Cayce Ingalls testified about text messages that Appellant and Spinks sent to each other from December 4 to 5, 2010. For example, at 4:37 p.m. on December 4, Spinks sent Appellant a text message saying that he would “be over” and that...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Eleby v. State (S24A0129), decided 2024-06-11.

    The State also offered evidence that Spinks texted Smith at 1:55 a.m. on December 5, asking him if he “want[ed] to hit a lick.” Smith asked, “where about and what’s it worth.” Spinks replied that “it’s [the] college boys,” and Smith said that he lived “right by” them, that he watched them, that there “ain’t none in there worth all that.” Smith added that...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Eleby v. State (S24A0129), decided 2024-06-11.

  5. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 22 de octubre de 2024

    CAMPBELL v. THE STATE (Four Cases)

    S24A0578, S24A0580, S24A0581, S24A1180

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato y pandillerismo de cuatro hombres del condado de Chatham, al determinar que, aunque el tribunal de primera instancia cometió un par de errores al admitir pruebas e instruir al jurado, esos errores no afectaron los veredictos.

    Sergeant Santoro testified about maps created based on records showing which cell phone towers Campbell’s and Parrish’s phones were connected to on the day of the murder. The records showed that at around 6:03 p.m., Campbell’s and Parrish’s phones were both in the area that was served by the same cell phone tower as Parrish’s house.10 At 6:16 p.m.,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, CAMPBELL v. THE STATE (Four Cases) (S24A0578, S24A0580, S24A0581, S24A1180), decided 2024-10-22. (b) Foley’s Murder.

    (c) Pastures’s Murder In January 2015, Pastures and his roommate, Harris, heard that they were in trouble with the gang, and on January 19, Pastures asked Sanders and Speaks to return the guns that Sanders had been keeping for Pastures.12 Around 5:00 p.m., Sanders and Speaks arrived at Pastures and Harris’s apartment, ostensibly to return the guns. Harris...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, CAMPBELL v. THE STATE (Four Cases) (S24A0578, S24A0580, S24A0581, S24A1180), decided 2024-10-22. (c) Pastures’s Murder.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  6. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de septiembre de 2024

    Pyne v. State

    S24A0670

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Jacob Pyne en la muerte a tiros de Gerard Foster, rechazando los argumentos de que su abogado de juicio fue ineficaz y de que el alegato final del fiscal trasladó indebidamente la carga de la prueba.

    Later on July 6, law enforcement officers located K. C.’s Impala at a residence connected to Demarcus White, a friend of Pyne’s, and they towed the vehicle to department headquarters. After obtaining a search warrant and conducting a search of the vehicle, law enforcement officers located Pyne’s cell phone and a credit card in his name inside the vehicle....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Pyne v. State (S24A0670), decided 2024-09-17.

    At trial, the State called Lisa Arnold, a GBI digital forensic investigator, to testify regarding her examination and data extraction of Pyne’s cell phone. During Pyne’s cross-examination of this witness, defense counsel questioned Investigator Arnold about whether she had also performed a data extraction of Foster’s cell phone, which was collected during...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Pyne v. State (S24A0670), decided 2024-09-17.

  7. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de enero de 2024

    Adams v. State

    S23A1207

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Fulton por un tiroteo mortal desde un vehículo en movimiento, rechazando sus alegaciones de que la evidencia era demasiado débil, que debía suprimirse la evidencia encontrada en su casa, y que su abogado tenía un conflicto de intereses por representarlo junto con su hermano.

    On August 22, 2016, the police went to the Adams home to execute an arrest warrant for Leon, who, unrelated to the shooting, had violated the terms of his probation. Officers knocked at the front door, and a woman permitted them to enter. When they showed the woman the warrant, she claimed nobody else was in the residence. But then Xavier Adams — Isaiah’s...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Adams v. State (S23A1207), decided 2024-01-17.

    The State also proved that, in addition to the .380-caliber handgun used to shoot Lowe, a 9mm handgun was fired into Dobson’s car. That handgun was discovered in the Adams home in Isaiah’s room the day following the murder. Further, a cell phone seized from the Adams home following the brothers’ arrests contained evidence that the phone’s user had,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Adams v. State (S23A1207), decided 2024-01-17.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  8. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 30 de abril de 2024

    Ward v. State

    S24A0352

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato en la comisión de un delito grave y cargos relacionados de un hombre del condado de Paulding, rechazando sus argumentos de que el jurado debió considerar la opción de homicidio voluntario, de que su condena por el segundo tiroteo era legalmente inconsistente, y de que su abogado fue ineficaz.

    10 Mason testified that she spoke to Brooks by phone on the night of the shootings, and she told him to park the Pathfinder in the garage at George’s house because it was “linked” to Mason as the renter of the vehicle. On March 30, 2021, law enforcement officers executed a search warrant at Ward’s residence and located Ward’s cell phone. Law enforcement...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ward v. State (S24A0352), decided 2024-04-30.

    The evidence presented in this case established the following with respect to Ward’s involvement in the second shooting: (1) Ward was driving a black Ford Explorer with New York plates on the night of March 24, 2021, which he later abandoned at a local park; (2) testimony from Ronnie Scogin and video footage captured from the Scoginses’ exterior...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ward v. State (S24A0352), decided 2024-04-30.

  9. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 31 de octubre de 2024

    WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL

    S24A0591

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó una ley estatal que tipifica como delito perturbar las sesiones y reuniones de la Asamblea General, y rechazó los argumentos de que la ley es inconstitucionalmente vaga o tan amplia que abarca expresión protegida.

    1. The statute is seriously flawed. I concur fully in the Court’s decision today that OCGA § 16-11- 34.1 does not criminalize so much protected speech and expressive conduct relative to its constitutionally permissible applications that it must be struck down as overbroad under State v. Fielden, 280 Ga. 444 (629 SE2d 252) (2006). But it is nevertheless...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL (S24A0591), decided 2024-10-31. Concurrence: PETERSON, Presiding Justice, concurring. 1. The statute is seriously flawed..

    wide-ranging scope of meetings far from the Capitol, as legislative study committees meet throughout the state. And it also reaches meetings of “caucus[es] of members,” some of which are public and clearly defined, such as the majority and minority caucuses, while others may be less obvious to outsiders.20 By not requiring disruptive intent or actual...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, WILLIAMS, CONGRESSWOMAN v. POWELL (S24A0591), decided 2024-10-31. Concurrence: PETERSON, Presiding Justice, concurring. 1. The statute is seriously flawed..

    3 pasajes más en este documento

  10. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2024

    Nunnally v. State

    S24A0574

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de DeKalb, dictaminando que las pruebas circunstanciales, incluidos los registros telefónicos y los mensajes de texto, fueron suficientes para probar que mató a su cliente de marihuana y que una instrucción al jurado sobre parte en un delito fue apropiada.

    2 On direct and cross-examination, Lamar conceded that he previously told investigators that Mitchell left his home around 2:00 a.m. on December 31, 2018. Notwithstanding his prior statement, Lamar confirmed at trial that Mitchell left between 10:00 p.m. and midnight. Appellant in November 2018 for him to use, and the other ending in -2761, which she used....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Nunnally v. State (S24A0574), decided 2024-08-13.

    Mitchell’s mother testified that because her tablet was synced with Mitchell’s phone, she could read the text messages on Mitchell’s phone. Using this information, she began calling the numbers Mitchell’s phone had recently texted. These numbers included the number corresponding to the phone McClendon had provided to Appellant. When Mitchell’s mother called...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Nunnally v. State (S24A0574), decided 2024-08-13.

  11. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de enero de 2024

    Williams v. State

    S23A1159

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Chatham por un tiroteo en un club nocturno, y determinó que cualquier error al admitir pruebas de teléfono celular y un video de demostración fue inofensivo dada la fuerte evidencia en su contra.

    1. Williams argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his cell phone. Assuming without deciding that the admission of this evidence was error, we conclude that any error was harmless. As established at a pre-trial hearing, Detective Jason Manley proceeded to Charietta’s home on the day of the shooting....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Williams v. State (S23A1159), decided 2024-01-17.

    Later, police obtained a passcode for the phone from Charietta. Williams filed a motion to suppress evidence gathered from the search of his phone, arguing that police illegally seized the phone without a search warrant or probable cause, and illegally searched his phone when they “without [a] warrant or probable cause deputized [Charietta] as [an] agent of...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Williams v. State (S23A1159), decided 2024-01-17.

  12. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 14 de marzo de 2024

    Andre Pugh v. State

    S23A1063

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Andre Pugh por matar a su esposa, dictaminando que la orden de registro del teléfono celular usada en su contra era válida y que sus abogados no fueron ineficaces en la forma en que la impugnaron.

    phone necessarily must list each specific kind or category of data the police may look through when they search the phone’s contents. Just as specifying the address of a home can be particular enough to allow police to search rooms, closets, and cabinets throughout the home, identifying a specific cell phone as the “place to be searched” may well be...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Andre Pugh v. State (S23A1063), decided 2024-03-14. Concurrence: PINSON, Justice, concurring.

    Instead, the point to take from Wilson is that a search warrant for a cell phone also needs to tell the police, with sufficient particularity, what they can look for in their search of the phone. As we indicated in Wilson, the warrant must limit the object of the search to evidence of the crimes that the police have probable cause to believe the suspect...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Andre Pugh v. State (S23A1063), decided 2024-03-14. Concurrence: PINSON, Justice, concurring.

    5 pasajes más en este documento

  13. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024

    Siders v. State

    S24A0607

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre en un homicidio durante una invasión a un hogar relacionada con drogas, rechazando sus alegatos sobre pruebas insuficientes, publicaciones de redes sociales admitidas indebidamente e instrucciones al jurado.

    Detective Scott Demeester, who was qualified as an expert in cell phone data interpretation and cell-site analysis, testified regarding data recovered from the defendants’ cell phones. A cell phone associated with Washington2 called and texted Jackson’s cell phone several times in the days leading up to the shooting. When Washington called Jackson around...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Siders v. State (S24A0607), decided 2024-10-15.

    Additional hotel surveillance video showed that the Pontiac entered the Best Western parking lot at 6:20 a.m. on the day after the shooting. Although the video did not show who exited the car, it did show three men unload what appeared to be heavy bags from the Pontiac. At 8:01 a.m., the three men returned to the car and left the hotel. The car then...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Siders v. State (S24A0607), decided 2024-10-15.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  14. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024

    Nabors v. State

    S24A0610

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Fulton, rechazando sus alegatos de que su abogado le aconsejó erróneamente no testificar y de que el caso se basaba únicamente en el testimonio de un cómplice.

    gender of the runners. Neither police officer recalled seeing a fourth runner. The third witness at the gas station testified that her attention was drawn to the Monte Carlo by the sound of arguing, immediately followed by gunfire. This witness testified that she saw three or four people around the vehicle, including a man later identified as Milan, who she...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Nabors v. State (S24A0610), decided 2024-10-15.

    4 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SCt 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966). stated Nabors went to the hospital with Milan and others in the early morning hours of April 3, 2018. However, the data offered no insight into Nabors’s location after 6:22 a.m., Nabors’s call logs showed no outgoing activity after that time, and his phone stopped receiving calls shortly...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Nabors v. State (S24A0610), decided 2024-10-15.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  15. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2024

    Bowman v. State

    S24A0642

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Polk por matar a su ex prometida, rechazando los reclamos de que su abogado de juicio fue ineficaz y determinando que cualquier error al admitir pruebas de su violencia pasada contra una ex esposa fue inofensivo.

    On April 4, 2017, at 5:28 a.m., Wolfe’s cell phone texted Bowman’s cell phone, “Good morning.” Bowman’s phone did not reply.2 Eleven seconds later, Wolfe texted “Good morning” to another cell phone ending in the digits 7925 (“-7925 phone”), which texted Wolfe’s phone “Good morning” at 5:30 a.m. The -7925 phone then called Wolfe’s phone at 5:30 a.m., and...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Bowman v. State (S24A0642), decided 2024-08-13.

    According to Detective Scott Demeester, an expert in cell phone forensics, the -7925 phone was a prepaid phone that lacked subscriber information and started service on March 9, 2017, about a month before the murder; was “not used very often” and “primarily communicated with the decedent”; and made or received only 11 calls from March 28 to April 7, 2017,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Bowman v. State (S24A0642), decided 2024-08-13.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  16. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024

    Wallace v. State

    S24A0422

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato en el marco de un delito grave de David Wallace en un tiroteo entre pandillas en el condado de Fulton, rechazando los argumentos de que la evidencia era demasiado débil, que sujetarlo con un grillete en el juicio fue injusto y que su abogado fue ineficaz.

    Detective Tyrone Dennis testified for the State as an expert in gangs, as mentioned above. As a general matter, Detective Dennis explained that Bloods members used the color red, five-pointed stars, and red tattoos to identify themselves. Furthermore, Detective Dennis explained to the jury that older members of gangs are called “OGs,” short for “original...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Wallace v. State (S24A0422), decided 2024-10-15.

    The State also presented tattoo and cell-phone evidence to the jury. Investigator Charles Prescott of the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office, who oversaw the office’s gang unit, testified that he executed a search warrant for Appellant’s, Barber’s, and Bowdery’s tattoos and markings by photographing them. According to Investigator Prescott, Appellant...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Wallace v. State (S24A0422), decided 2024-10-15.

  17. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 2 de julio de 2024

    Grant v. State

    S24A0843

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato durante la comisión de un delito grave de una mujer del condado de Chatham, dictaminando que la evidencia circunstancial que la vinculaba con el hombre que mató a un apostador que acababa de ganar miles de dólares era legalmente suficiente.

    Shawntray’s body was found lying next to his vehicle in the parking lot of his apartment complex. He had suffered multiple gunshot wounds and was pronounced dead at the scene. Police recovered five shell casings and several spent bullets from around Shawntray’s body, as well as Shawntray’s empty wallet. Shawntray’s Springfield XD 9mm handgun was also...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Grant v. State (S24A0843), decided 2024-07-02.

  18. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2024

    Johnson v. State

    S24A0633

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de DeKalb por apuñalar al padre de su exnovia, rechazando los reclamos de que el juez de primera instancia debió haber dado ciertas instrucciones al jurado o excluido una declaración de oídas.

    On the same day, Jasmine obtained an ex parte temporary restraining order prohibiting Johnson from “harassing, harming, or abusing the Petitioner’s family or household” and stating that Johnson had no legal right to visit and had no custodial rights regarding K. J. Johnson “kept calling” and texting Louis and Robinson about K. J. so much that they “had to ....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Johnson v. State (S24A0633), decided 2024-08-13.

  19. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 14 de mayo de 2024

    Feder v. State

    S24A0528

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Visheslav Feder, dictaminando que los veredictos mixtos del jurado sobre cargos relacionados de disparos eran meramente inconsistentes, no legalmente repugnantes, y que la decisión de su abogado de no presentar una moción de supresión fue razonable.

    Based on the record before us, Feder has failed to prove that trial counsel’s performance was deficient. The record makes clear that trial counsel made the strategic decision not to move to suppress the cell phone records. Though Feder does not detail what “damaging” evidence in these records should have been suppressed, trial counsel testified at the...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Feder v. State (S24A0528), decided 2024-05-14.

    cell phone records. Therefore, it was reasonable for trial counsel not to raise a motion to suppress. See Washington v. State, 313 Ga. 771, 774 (3) (b) (873 SE2d 132) (2022) (appellant failed to show that counsel performed deficiently by failing to object to evidence on foundation grounds where appellant failed to argue, much less demonstrate, that the...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Feder v. State (S24A0528), decided 2024-05-14.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  20. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 6 de febrero de 2024

    Rashad v. State

    S23A0864

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Floyd por matar al hijo de dos años de su novia, y determinó que la evidencia fue suficiente para el jurado y que las decisiones de su abogado defensor no fueron constitucionalmente deficientes.

    (i) April 12, 2018 On the morning of April 12, Sydney, taking Adrian with her, dropped L. D. off at school and then ran errands with Adrian. After Sydney and Adrian returned home, she cleaned the house and he ran around. At one point, Adrian knocked a TV onto himself. Sydney picked him up, and after he “wiggl[ed] to get back down,” she set him down and he...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Rashad v. State (S23A0864), decided 2024-02-06. (i) April 12, 2018.

    Early in the morning at about 6:00 a.m., after Sydney texted Rashad to ask if he was up, he texted: “I hope this boy is okay [ ]b/c he acted like his [sic] is so sleepy.” Sydney texted back that she was worried about Adrian. At about 6:50 a.m., as she was getting off work, she and Rashad spoke on the phone, and Rashad told her that Adrian had a seizure. In...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Rashad v. State (S23A0864), decided 2024-02-06. (i) April 12, 2018.

Afinar los resultados

Los números cuentan los documentos que encontró esta búsqueda.

Año

Los resultados se ordenan con los modelos de representación y reordenamiento de Voyage AI. Ningún modelo escribe el texto que usted ve en un resultado: cada pasaje se cita de un documento guardado, y los resúmenes escritos por Georgia Commons están identificados como tales.

Legible por máquinas https://georgiacommons.org/search.md?q=cell+phones+in+school · https://georgiacommons.org/index.md · MCP https://mcp.georgiacommons.org/mcp