Ir al contenido
Georgia Commons
Menú

Buscar en todas las colecciones

Buscar en Georgia Commons

Proyectos de ley, opiniones de la Corte Suprema, el Código y las dos constituciones, y transcripciones de las reuniones de la Cámara y el Senado, en una sola búsqueda. Pregunte con palabras sencillas: la búsqueda ordena los pasajes por su significado y también por sus palabras.

Los documentos están en inglés, así que una búsqueda en inglés encuentra más.

Filtros:Opiniones de la Corte Suprema 2026 Quitar filtros

Se encontraron 72 documentos.

  1. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 5 de mayo de 2026

    Jackson v. State

    S26A0444

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas de un hombre del condado de DeKalb por el asesinato de un niño de nueve meses y otros tiroteos relacionados con pandillas, rechazando impugnaciones a la evidencia, al desempeño de su abogado y al manejo por parte del juez de primera instancia de una solicitud de anulación del juicio.

    Agent Thompson testified as an expert in criminal street gangs and street gang activity. 10 As to cell phones, Agent Thomp- son testified that they were being smuggled into Georgia prisons at an increased rate and that they allowed for inmates—and par- ticularly gang members—to engage in criminal activity from prison. He also described the methods by which...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Jackson v. State (S26A0444), decided 2026-05-05.

    Dixon was present for Malone’s murder, afterwards fleeing to Marco Watson’s apartment where Devin Thomas—who was also an SMM member—was present. Dixon was “really frantic” as she told Watson and Thomas about Malone’s murder. After hearing about what had happened, Thomas “felt somebody would have to get some get back for this.” Thomas testified that he then...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Jackson v. State (S26A0444), decided 2026-05-05.

    5 pasajes más en este documento

  2. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 27 de octubre de 2026

    State v. McGriff

    S26A1568

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia revocó la orden de un juez del condado de Clinch que excluía la declaración de un adolescente del 11 de marzo ante los investigadores, pero devolvió dos declaraciones anteriores para que se aclaren los hechos, porque las conclusiones del juez no sustentaban adecuadamente que él estuviera bajo custodia.

    (b) March 6 Statement At the motion to suppress hearing, the State presented the testimony of Agent Hundley in connection with McGriff’s March 6 interview. Agent Hundley testified that she asked to speak to McGriff at the Florida hospital, 9 and after he agreed, she inter- viewed him in a waiting room; a portion of that interview was audio recorded. She did...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, State v. McGriff (S26A1568), decided 2026-10-27. (b) March 6 Statement.

    The trial court also orally granted the motion to suppress the statements made in the March 6 interview, finding that Agent Hundley “drove to another state to get the cell phone of the De- fendant in a hospital, took him to a room, had a conversation that lasted almost 30 minutes that she deemed fit to record. There w[ere] conversations not on recording....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, State v. McGriff (S26A1568), decided 2026-10-27. (b) March 6 Statement.

  3. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2026

    Dorsey v. State

    S26A1065

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato en la comisión de un delito grave de un hombre del condado de DeKalb, dictaminando que las fotos y el video que lo mostraban con armas fueron admitidos correctamente y que la falta de su abogado en exigir instrucciones al jurado sobre identificación no cambió el resultado del juicio.

    1. The evidence presented at trial showed the following. In October 2021, 22-year-old Wilson—who was on leave from the military—met 16-year-old Salazar-Chavez. Soon thereafter, the pair began an exclusive romantic relationship. Most of their re- lationship was long-distance, as Wilson was stationed in South Korea or North Carolina while Salazar-Chavez...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Dorsey v. State (S26A1065), decided 2026-08-13.

    Wilson was shot in his left leg; Salazar-Chavez was shot in her left arm and the left side of her chest. A medical examiner testified that Salazar-Chavez died from the shot to her chest. Investigators who responded to the scene recovered 11 nine-millimeter cartridge casings, and a firearms examiner later testified that all 11 of those casings were fired...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Dorsey v. State (S26A1065), decided 2026-08-13.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  4. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 9 de septiembre de 2026

    Ash v. State

    S26A0975

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Richard Ash, dictaminando que los datos de ubicación del teléfono celular y otras pruebas respaldaron suficientemente el testimonio de un cómplice y que el silencio de Ash durante la anulación de su primer juicio implicó una renuncia a cualquier impugnación por doble incriminación contra su nuevo juicio.

    Atlanta Police Detective Kevin Leonpacher, who was tendered as an expert at trial in the field of “historical cell phone data,” “cell tower analysis,” and “phone data analysis,” testified that he received phone records from the cellular service providers for the cell phones of Ash, Fuller, Larkins, Mack, and Sherry pursuant to a search warrant. Detective...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ash v. State (S26A0975), decided 2026-09-09.

    6 Ash’s Google account, including his gmail account, and his location services were activated on his cell phone. residence in Riverdale, 7 and at 5:38 a.m., the user of Ash’s cell phone placed a call near the intersection of Hadlock Street and Leslie Avenue while in close proximity to the other defendants’ cell phones. At 10:08 p.m. on August 4, the user of...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ash v. State (S26A0975), decided 2026-09-09.

  5. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de febrero de 2026

    Dempsey v. State

    S25A1111

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato con agravantes de un adolescente del condado de Gwinnett en las muertes por disparos de dos hombres durante un trato de marihuana fallido, al considerar suficiente la evidencia y adecuada la decisión del juez de primera instancia de permitir que el jurado supiera sobre su libertad condicional.

    On August 10, Sergeant Pierson interviewed Dempsey, who was 16 at the time, at his home with his grandmother present. During the interview, Dempsey gave his cell phone to Sergeant Pierson. On August 15, after reading Dempsey the “Advice of Rights to Juveniles” form, 4 Sergeant Pierson interviewed Dempsey again in the presence of his grandmother at police...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Dempsey v. State (S25A1111), decided 2026-02-17.

    acquaintance of Davis, and Davis committed the murders.7 Additionally, Dempsey stated that, after investigators searched the Amy Road house, Davis called Dempsey and said that investigators found a firearm inside the house.8 After Sergeant Pierson obtained a search warrant for the information on Dempsey’s cell phone, the Gwinnett County Police Department’s...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Dempsey v. State (S25A1111), decided 2026-02-17.

  6. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 18 de agosto de 2026

    Greene v. State

    S26A0810

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato en la comisión de un delito grave de un hombre del condado de Sumter, al determinar que la evidencia era suficiente para que el jurado rechazara su alegato de legítima defensa y que su abogado de juicio no fue constitucionalmente deficiente.

    By way of background, on the second day of trial, the trial court sua sponte addressed jurors about potential misconduct on two occasions. First, the court dismissed the jury for lunch but asked an alternate juror to stay behind and asked her if she had been falling asleep. The alternate juror responded that she had not been falling asleep, that she had a...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Greene v. State (S26A0810), decided 2026-08-18.

    Second, there is no evidence that the juror who checked his cell phone used the phone for any case-related purpose that might have impacted Greene’s right to a fair trial. The record suggested the opposite, as the juror’s explanation that he had used his cell phone to check a message from his mother indicated that he had used the phone for a personal...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Greene v. State (S26A0810), decided 2026-08-18.

  7. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 30 de junio de 2026

    Owens v. State

    S26A0627

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas de Celeste Alexandria Owens por asesinato y crueldad infantil en la muerte de la hija de ocho años de su novia, dictaminando que la evidencia en video, los hallazgos médicos y el testimonio de una niña sobreviviente eran suficientes para respaldar el veredicto del jurado.

    Police officers asked if Hall and Owens would accompany them to police headquarters to be interviewed, and they agreed, bringing the children along. Once there, Owens gave a video-rec- orded interview that was played for the jury at trial. During Ow- ens’s interview, investigators checked with her sister, who said Owens did not visit her the night before...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Owens v. State (S26A0627), decided 2026-06-30.

    Investigators also found on Owens’s cell phone Google searches from November 19 for “What to do when a child just won’t listen,” “lakes near me,” “How the sewers on the streets work[],” “Why do kids run away?” and “How do I report someone missing?” All these searches had been deleted. By investigating the cell phone, business and financial records,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Owens v. State (S26A0627), decided 2026-06-30.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  8. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de abril de 2026

    Larkins v. State

    S26A0306

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Matthew Larkins en la muerte a tiros de Shanna Smith, rechazando impugnaciones al testimonio del cómplice, a una instrucción al jurado, al desempeño de su abogado, a pruebas de oídas y a la estrategia del argumento final del fiscal.

    Fuller testified that, shortly after leaving the scene, he realized he had dropped his cell phone, but he did not know when or where. Later that morning, Jones told Fuller that the Atlanta Police Department had his cell phone, and when Fuller was interviewed by detectives in February 2017, he initially claimed he had lost the phone about a week prior to the...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Larkins v. State (S26A0306), decided 2026-04-21.

    Atlanta Police Detective Kevin Leonpacher, who was tendered as an expert at trial in the field of “historical cell phone data,” “cell tower analysis,” and “phone data analysis,” testified that he received phone records from the cellular service providers for the cell phones of Larkins, Fuller, Ash, Mack, and Sherry pursuant to a search warrant. Detective...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Larkins v. State (S26A0306), decided 2026-04-21.

    4 pasajes más en este documento

  9. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 9 de septiembre de 2026

    Kennedy v. State

    S26A0576

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena de Malik Kennedy por asesinato con malicia en la muerte de una niña de dos años, dictaminando que la evidencia fue suficiente y que cualquier error al admitir evidencia del teléfono celular fue inofensivo.

    At trial, the medical examiner and Dr. Frasier testified about the extent of Trinity’s injuries, observing that Trinity would have had to endure violent shaking to suffer the head injuries that caused her death. Trinity was under the sole care of Kennedy when she suffered these injuries, and Kennedy admitted that he shook her while Kyles was at work....

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Kennedy v. State (S26A0576), decided 2026-09-09.

    (a) On May 2, 2021, the trial court authorized search war- rant No. 21X00592 (the “Seizure Warrant”), which allowed offic- ers to search the motel room and seize medications (prescribed or over the counter), illegal substances, blood, DNA, corpse of the deceased child, clothing and bedding, and electronic devices in room #206 at 3500 Venture Parkway,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Kennedy v. State (S26A0576), decided 2026-09-09.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  10. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de marzo de 2026

    Rainey v. State

    S26A0399

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas de una mujer del condado de Fulton por homicidio grave y allanamiento de morada, al determinar que la evidencia mostró que ella dirigió a otros hacia un dormitorio específico al que no tenía derecho a entrar y que su voz fue debidamente identificada en el juicio.

    Appellant’s aunt testified that Appellant, who went to live with her for a few weeks after leaving the rooming house, told her that Appellant’s boyfriend (Ellison) went into the rooming house with a gun, that he harmed people, that someone shot him as he was leaving the house, and that Appellant then left the scene. 3 A detective testified that Medina...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Rainey v. State (S26A0399), decided 2026-03-17.

  11. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 14 de octubre de 2026

    Brown v. State

    S26A1299

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Cobb por las muertes a tiros de una pareja durante un trato de drogas que salió mal, y resolvió que cualquier error al admitir su condena por robo de 1994 fue inofensivo ante las abrumadoras pruebas de culpabilidad.

    At 1:18 a.m. on August 6, Catherine’s phone sent a message (pur- portedly from Anthony) to Brown’s phone observing that Brown was not by himself. At 1:20 a.m., Brown’s phone responded that his nephew was driving him because he did not have a driver’s license. Catherine’s phone sent a message to Brown’s phone at 1:23 a.m. telling Brown to enter their car and...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Brown v. State (S26A1299), decided 2026-10-14.

    We agree with the State that the evidence against Brown was very strong. Text messages showed that Brown communi- cated with the victims about a drug transaction right before the shootings. Two witnesses testified to Brown’s plan to rob the vic- tims and that Brown confessed to shooting them. The murder vic- tims’ young daughter, who was found in the car...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Brown v. State (S26A1299), decided 2026-10-14.

  12. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 3 de febrero de 2026

    SHELLS v. THE STATE (Two Cases)

    S25A1372, S26A0138

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato y robo de Lewis Shells y Marcus Leslie, rechazando impugnaciones sobre la suficiencia de las pruebas, los procedimientos del juicio, las decisiones sobre pruebas y las alegaciones de que sus abogados fueron ineficaces.

    6. Leslie contends that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing the State to present expert opinion regarding the location of the defendants’ cell phones through a lay witness, Analyst Andrew Foy with the LaGrange Police Department. While pretrial matters were being discussed, the defense orally moved to exclude Foy’s testimony because he did not...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, SHELLS v. THE STATE (Two Cases) (S25A1372, S26A0138), decided 2026-02-03.

    Foy was then called to testify. He was not tendered as an expert, and he testified from the cell phone records already admitted in evidence, as well as his own reports, which were tendered and admitted during his testimony, about the location of the defendants’ cell phones during the timeframe of the crimes. Foy began by explaining that he was an “analyst”...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, SHELLS v. THE STATE (Two Cases) (S25A1372, S26A0138), decided 2026-02-03.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  13. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de febrero de 2026

    Bradford v. State

    S26A0194

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato y actividad de pandillas de un hombre del condado de Fulton, rechazando reclamos de evidencia insuficiente y asistencia legal ineficaz, pero criticó duramente la demora de 13 años en resolver sus mociones posteriores a la condena.

    Ga. 650, 653 (2015). But in a sufficiency analysis for cases tried under the pre-2013 Evidence Code, which applied to this trial, we do not consider improperly admitted hearsay evidence, which was considered to have no probative value. Id. at 653 n.2. (a) The trial evidence that we can consider on sufficiency review. Before engaging in our sufficiency...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Bradford v. State (S26A0194), decided 2026-02-17. 2. The evidence was sufficient..

    10 We had held that, under the old Evidence Code, unless it was the rare case in which the conduct of an investigating officer was a matter needing to be explained, it was error to permit an investigating officer to testify, under the guise of explaining the officer’s conduct, to what other persons said to the officer during the investigation. See, e.g.,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Bradford v. State (S26A0194), decided 2026-02-17. 2. The evidence was sufficient..

    3 pasajes más en este documento

  14. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de enero de 2026

    Wells v. State

    S25A1496

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena de Tobias Wells por asesinato con delito grave por un tiroteo mortal durante un intento de robo, rechazando sus reclamos sobre la evidencia, los acuerdos de culpabilidad de los coacusados y las instrucciones al jurado.

    Investigators got phone records for Street’s cell phone, as well as cell-site location information (CSLI) from her phone and the phones of Wells, Gilstrap, and Banks. The cell phone data, combined with license-plate-reader images of Street’s car and the video sur- veillance of the shooting, painted a picture of the group’s movements and communications on...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Wells v. State (S25A1496), decided 2026-01-21. 1. Evidence at Trial.

    The group left in Street’s car. On the way back to the site of the dice game, the group dropped off Wells and Banks so that Wells could pick up a jacket to wear as a disguise. Then Street, Gilstrap, and Brantley continued on to the apartment complex, while staying in close contact with Wells. At 12:36 a.m., Street texted Wells, “We on the way to the move,”...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Wells v. State (S25A1496), decided 2026-01-21. 1. Evidence at Trial.

  15. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 30 de junio de 2026

    Collins v. State

    S26A0426, S26A0427

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato con circunstancias agravantes y secuestro de vehículo de dos hombres involucrados en un tiroteo en una gasolinera del condado de Gwinnett, y rechazó impugnaciones a la evidencia del juicio, las instrucciones al jurado, una confesión hecha en prisión y el juramento del jurado.

    From the gas station surveillance videos, law enforcement officers determined that the assailants were driving a black Mercedes E350. Using a license-plate reader system, law enforcement officers also determined that there was one black Mercedes around the gas station at the time of the shooting and that it was a rental car that had been rented to Booker...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Collins v. State (S26A0426, S26A0427), decided 2026-06-30. 1. The evidence presented at trial showed that, at 12:34.

  16. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 18 de agosto de 2026

    Williams v. State

    S26A0998

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Gwinnett, rechazando sus alegatos de que la legítima defensa debió protegerlo, que su abogado arruinó una investigación telefónica y que un registro de mensajes de texto fue admitido indebidamente.

    Additionally, investigators found a black iPhone 11 that be- longed to Pough and a red iPhone 12 that belonged to Williams.4 Law enforcement officers performed a full data extraction from Pough’s phone, but only a limited extraction from Williams’s phone. 5 3 See OCGA § 16-13-25(3)(P) (providing that, except under certain cir- cumstances not present here,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Williams v. State (S26A0998), decided 2026-08-18.

    At Williams’s motion-for-new-trial hearing, his trial coun- sel testified that he met with Williams “probably four times” prior to trial and that he discussed trial strategy with Williams “exten- sively.” When asked about the limited data retrieval performed on Williams’s phone, trial counsel testified that he “suppose[d] that, with the defendant’s consent,...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Williams v. State (S26A0998), decided 2026-08-18.

  17. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2026

    Lenon v. State

    S26A0756

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato de Angelo Lenon, al dictaminar que su abogado de juicio no fue ineficaz por no impugnar las órdenes de registro de celulares que él consideraba demasiado amplias.

    WARREN, Presiding Justice. In October 2022, Angelo Lenon was convicted of two counts of malice murder, felony murder, and possession of a firearm dur- ing the commission of a felony related to the shooting deaths of Daishone Flagg, Jeremie Tyson, and Andrew Barkley. He ap- peals his convictions, arguing that trial counsel provided ineffec- tive assistance...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Lenon v. State (S26A0756), decided 2026-08-13.

    At Lenon’s trial, the State introduced evidence gathered from Lenon’s two cell phones pursuant to search warrants. 2 This evidence included data showing that: the phones were near the crime scene before the shooting; location tracking was turned off both phones around the time of the shooting; the phones were moving quickly at the time Tyson called 911...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Lenon v. State (S26A0756), decided 2026-08-13.

    2 pasajes más en este documento

  18. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 30 de junio de 2026

    State v. Ovalle

    S26A0544

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia devolvió un caso de drogas del condado de Bartow al tribunal de primera instancia tras determinar que el juez usó la prueba legal incorrecta al conceder a Erik Ovalle un nuevo juicio por un cargo de asesinato con delito grave vinculado a una venta fatal de fentanilo.

    Ovalle’s statements were substantiated by text messages between Nicholson and Ovalle. Nicholson did not have his own cell phone and used the cell phone of one of his co-workers to com- municate with Ovalle. On June 19, 2021, Nicholson texted Ovalle and said the “boyd,” or heroin, he had gotten from Ovalle the night before was “bad.” Specifically, the text...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, State v. Ovalle (S26A0544), decided 2026-06-30. Dissent: LAGRUA, Justice, dissenting.

  19. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 1 de julio de 2026

    Miller v. State

    S26A0374

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia anuló parte del proceso de condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de DeKalb, al determinar que el juez de primera instancia usó la prueba legal equivocada para decidir si la policía mintió o indujo a error de forma imprudente a los magistrados en las solicitudes de órdenes de registro.

    After receiving Miller’s name during the investigation, law enforcement discovered a pre-existing “be on the lookout” or “BOLO” depicting Miller’s face, connected to an alleged armed robbery that occurred at an Exxon gas station in Rockdale County on January 13, 2020, more than a month before the February Tic Toc shooting. The BOLO from that January 2020...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Miller v. State (S26A0374), decided 2026-07-01. 1. Facts.

    The extraction of the -9710 phone revealed a contact listed as “Rarri” with a phone number ending in -6516 and another contact listed as “Ronnie” with the phone number matching the - 8355 phone. At some point during the investigation, law enforcement developed a lead regarding a second suspect, Miller’s co-defendant, Character. The call logs of Miller’s...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Miller v. State (S26A0374), decided 2026-07-01. 1. Facts.

    1 pasaje más en este documento

  20. Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de abril de 2026

    Ragland v. State

    S26A0495

    Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato y robo a mano armada de un hombre del condado de DeKalb, rechazando argumentos sobre un contrainterrogatorio limitado, una grabación de la cárcel, y reclamos de que su abogado de juicio fue ineficaz.

    The trial evidence showed the following. 2 Courtney Johnson was best friends with Adair and considered him to be “like [a] brother.” Johnson was also friends with Justin Cunningham, who was best friends with Ragland and introduced him to Johnson. In November 2016, Johnson introduced Adair to Ragland, from whom she bought drugs. Adair also began buying drugs...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ragland v. State (S26A0495), decided 2026-04-21.

    At the motion for new trial hearing, trial counsel testified that when he learned the State had intended to use a new FBI technology that generated more precise cell-site location data, he began to search for an expert on the subject in order to review and advise him about the data. Counsel identified Larry Daniel as a potential expert, and the two...

    Abrir en este pasajeSupreme Court of Georgia, Ragland v. State (S26A0495), decided 2026-04-21. 4. Ragland argues that trial counsel was ineffective on several grounds. None of these grounds have merit..

    1 pasaje más en este documento

Afinar los resultados

Los números cuentan los documentos que encontró esta búsqueda.

Tipo de documento

Año

Los resultados se ordenan con los modelos de representación y reordenamiento de Voyage AI. Ningún modelo escribe el texto que usted ve en un resultado: cada pasaje se cita de un documento guardado, y los resúmenes escritos por Georgia Commons están identificados como tales.

Legible por máquinas https://georgiacommons.org/search.md?q=cell+phones+in+school · https://georgiacommons.org/index.md · MCP https://mcp.georgiacommons.org/mcp