Georgia CommonsBuscar en todas las colecciones
Buscar en Georgia Commons
Proyectos de ley, opiniones de la Corte Suprema, el Código y las dos constituciones, y transcripciones de las reuniones de la Cámara y el Senado, en una sola búsqueda. Pregunte con palabras sencillas: la búsqueda ordena los pasajes por su significado y también por sus palabras.
Filtros:2024 Quitar filtros
Se encontraron 280 pasajes en 129 documentos.
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 19 de noviembre de 2024
In THE MATTER OF ESTON WILLIAM HOOD, JR. (Two Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia suspendió al abogado Eston William Hood, Jr. por dos años, rechazando una suspensión recomendada de un año por considerarla demasiado indulgente dado que admitió haber hecho declaraciones falsas al abogado contrario, al personal del tribunal y al propio Colegio de Abogados del Estado.
16 The Special Master also determined that ABA Standard 9.32 (d) (good- faith effort to make restitution) applied in mitigation because, in 2023, Hood fully refunded the attorney fee and filing fee to his client in SDBD No. 7470. But we decline to apply this mitigating factor because Hood did not make the reimbursement until long after the disciplinary...
We have carefully reviewed the entire record in this case and conclude that a one-year suspension is an insufficient level of discipline under the facts of this case. This Court has repeatedly recognized that “making false statements to the Bar during the disciplinary process is a very serious matter which typically results in, at least, a significant...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 11 de junio de 2024
Hill v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato con malicia de un hombre del condado de Newton por estrangular a su novia, rechazando sus impugnaciones a las pruebas, el manejo por el tribunal de primera instancia de las mociones de nulidad del juicio y la selección del jurado, y el desempeño de su abogado.
(b) On appeal, Hill argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying each motion for mistrial, contending that each piece of testimony discussed above, individually and when viewed collectively, deprived him of a fair trial. “Whether to grant a motion for mistrial is within the trial court’s sound discretion, and the trial court’s exercise of...
9 Although, as noted above, trial counsel did not move to strike six of the jurors about which Hill complains in Division 4, Hill argues only that counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to move to strike five of those jurors; he does not include one of the jurors in this ineffective-assistance claim. so patently unreasonable that no competent...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 5 de noviembre de 2024
In the Matter of John Carl Huber
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia inhabilitó al abogado John Carl Huber al aceptar la entrega voluntaria de su licencia, con efecto retroactivo al 12 de mayo de 2021, tras sus condenas por delitos graves de agresión agravada, allanamiento de morada y otros delitos.
1 Rule 8.4 (a) (2) provides that it shall be a violation of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct for a lawyer to be convicted of a felony. a petition for a writ of certiorari, which we denied. See Case No. S23C1147 (denied February 6, 2024). The trial court then entered an amended sentencing order merging the two counts. Huber remained incarcerated...
320 Ga. 314 FINAL COPY S24Y1132. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN CARL HUBER.
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024
Espinosa v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la denegación de la solicitud de un hombre para retirar su declaración de culpabilidad por apuñalar hasta la muerte al hijo de 15 años de su novia, rechazando su alegato de que su abogado debió haberle informado sobre una posible defensa de enajenación mental.
At the hearing, plea counsel testified that he had practiced in Georgia since 2007. He had worked both as a public defender and in private practice as a criminal defense attorney and had handled thousands of felony cases. Counsel explained the way he typically handled a murder case, i.e., meeting with the client, requesting discovery, taking discovery to...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 17 de septiembre de 2024
Gallegos-Munoz v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia aclaró que una regla de 1989 que exigía a los jueces determinar primero que acusaciones previas de abuso sexual eran 'probablemente falsas' antes de permitir que el jurado las conociera ya no aplica bajo el Código de Pruebas de 2013 del estado.
To clarify the consideration of prior-accusation evidence in sex offense trials governed by Georgia’s 2013 Evidence Code, we undertake the following analysis: (a) we summarize our holding in Smith under the previous Evidence Code that Georgia’s rape-shield statute does not bar prior-accusation evidence in sex offense trials and the announcement in Smith of...
(a) Our holdings in Smith. “The main issue on appeal” in Smith was “whether [former] OCGA § 24-2-3, commonly referred to as [Georgia’s] rape-shield law, bar[red] admission of testimony regarding the victim’s alleged past false accusations against persons other than the defendant.” Smith, 259 Ga. at 135-136. We held that the rape-shield statute, which is now...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 2 de julio de 2024
In the Matter of Curtis Lee Allen
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia rechazó la solicitud de un abogado de igualar una suspensión de diez días de Florida porque no adjuntó documentos disciplinarios clave de Florida ni demostró que había dejado de ejercer la abogacía durante esa suspensión.
when an attorney requests entry of a suspension or voluntary surrender order nunc pro tunc, it is the lawyer’s responsibility to demonstrate that they voluntarily stopped practicing law, the date on which their law practice ended, and that they complied with all the ethical obligations implicated in such a decision, such as assisting clients in securing new...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 16 de abril de 2024
In the Matter of Paul Jason York
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia rechazó la suspensión de tres años propuesta para un abogado por falsificar las firmas de un juez y un fiscal, y consideró indebido permitirle reanudar el ejercicio de la abogacía mientras siguen pendientes cargos penales relacionados por falsificación.
substance abuse problems have been addressed, (b) providing proof that he is in compliance with the PDA, and (c) providing proof that he complied with his obligations to attend counseling and support meetings pursuant to the second condition. Moreover, the Special Master noted that if York is convicted of a crime arising from the same facts as this...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 27 de junio de 2024
White v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas de Erica White por asesinato y RICO por la muerte por envenenamiento con codeína de su hijo de dos años con discapacidad, rechazando reclamos sobre pruebas indebidas, falta de separación de cargos, defectos en la acusación, asistencia legal ineficaz y evidencia ocultada.
the expert could not rule out the possibility that it was White’s signature. Pretermitting whether trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to present the testimony of a handwriting expert at trial, White “has not shown that there is a reasonable probability that the expert’s testimony would have made a difference in h[er] trial.” Parker v. State, 305...
White contends that Count 16 should have been quashed based on a special demurrer because Part III of Count 16 did not allege (1) whether the alleged RICO activity was committed in furtherance of an incident, scheme, or transaction; and (2) of which alleged factual incident, scheme, or transaction the alleged racketeering activity is alleged to be in...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de octubre de 2024
In the Matter of Curtis Lee Allen
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia aceptó la solicitud corregida de un abogado radicado en Florida para una disciplina recíproca, imponiendo una suspensión de diez días con efecto retroactivo a su suspensión previa en Florida y reincorporándolo de inmediato.
Based on those facts, Allen requested, as substantially similar discipline, that this Court suspend his license to practice law in Georgia for ten days, nunc pro tunc and concurrent with his ten-day Florida suspension, and that the Court allow his reinstatement upon the entry of its opinion. But this Court rejected his original petition because Allen...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 11 de junio de 2024
OMSTEAD v. BPG INSPECTION, LLC
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia dictaminó que la cláusula del contrato de una empresa de inspección de viviendas que prohíbe demandas más de un año después de una inspección es aplicable, incluso contra un reclamo por muerte injusta que surgió después de que ese año expiró.
But these sorts of distinctions are difficult for a court to draw in any principled manner, and I don’t see a clear legal basis under because the plaintiff did not raise it below. But it’s not clear to me that a too- short limitations period must always be assessed under only unconscionability, rather than assessed through a public policy lens as an...
claims. She later added a count for gross negligence.4 BPG moved for summary judgment, seeking to enforce the Inspection Agreement’s limitations on liability, including its one-year limitation. Omstead filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, asking, among other things, that the trial court hold that the one-year limitation provision was void as against...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 5 de marzo de 2024
Palmer v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato de Willie Williams Palmer de su cuarto juicio, rechazando sus reclamos de que se violaron sus derechos a un juicio rápido y que el tribunal de primera instancia excluyó indebidamente pruebas que señalaban a otros posibles sospechosos.
Application of the Barker-Doggett balancing test to particular cases is committed to the sound discretion of the trial courts. See Heard v. State, 295 Ga. 559, 563 (761 SE2d 314) (2014). Thus, on appeal from a ruling on a speedy trial claim, we accept the trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review the trial court’s...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de agosto de 2024
Garrison v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia dictaminó que los fiscales no tienen que probar que las órdenes de emergencia judicial por COVID-19 extendieron un plazo para acusar a una acusada de DUI, pero devolvió su caso porque se usó la prueba legal equivocada para admitir pruebas de sobriedad de campo similares a la del alcoholímetro.
failed altogether to consider the proposed expert’s qualifications. See Spencer v. State, 302 Ga. 133, 136 (805 SE2d 886) (2017); Duncan v. State, 305 Ga. App. 268, 270-271 (2) (699 SE2d 341) (2010); Hawkins v. State, 223 Ga. App. 34, 38 (1) (476 SE2d 803) (1996); Cherry v. State, 345 Ga. App. 409, 412 (2) (813 SE2d 408) (2018). This reliance was misplaced...
We also granted certiorari to determine whether admission of horizontal gaze nystagmus (“HGN”) test evidence must be assessed according to the new standard imposed by a recent amendment to OCGA § 24-7-702. We conclude that it must be, that this new standard was not applied below, and that if the evidence was not admissible under the new standard, the trial...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 5 de marzo de 2024
Jennings v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de Savanna Jennings por ayudar a orquestar la muerte de su abuelo, rechazando sus reclamos sobre pruebas indebidas y defensa legal ineficaz.
(i) Jennings contends that her trial counsel performed deficiently by failing to preserve her objection to the exclusion of Lieutenant Scott’s testimony, but as shown above, Jennings preserved her objection. Thus, we conclude that counsel did not perform deficiently. See Salvesen, 317 Ga. at 321 (4). (ii) Pretermitting whether Jennings’s trial counsel...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 1 de octubre de 2024
In THE MATTER OF JOHN L.G. HERBERT, JR. (Four Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia inhabilitó al abogado John L. G. Herbert, Jr. tras incurrir en rebeldía frente a cargos disciplinarios que lo acusaban de tomar aproximadamente $850,000 confiados por inversionistas inmobiliarios extranjeros.
7 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ll funds held by a lawyer for a client and all funds held by a lawyer in any other fiduciary capacity shall be deposited in and administered from a trust account.” 8 This Rule provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o funds shall be withdrawn from such trust accounts for the personal use of the lawyer...
11 This Rule provides: (1) A lawyer shall designate all trust accounts, whether general or specific, as well as all deposit slips and checks drawn thereon, as an “Attorney Trust Account,” “Attorney Escrow Account” “IOLTA Account” or “Attorney Fiduciary Account.” The name of the attorney or law firm responsible for the account shall also appear on all...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 22 de octubre de 2024
MOORE v. WHITE, WARDEN
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia revocó la negación de reparación de habeas a un hombre condenado por robo agravado de primer grado, coincidiendo con el estado en que su abogado de apelación debió impugnar la acusación por no alegar que entró a una vivienda.
indictment. In this respect, he argued that although OCGA § 16-7-1 (b) says, as pertinent here, that a person commits the crime of first- degree burglary when he, without authority and with the intent to commit a felony, enters a “dwelling house of another” or a building “designed for use as the dwelling of another,” the indictment alleged that he committed...
2. In reviewing the denial of a petition for habeas corpus, although we “‘accept[ ] the habeas court’s factual findings and credibility determinations unless they are clearly erroneous,’” we “‘independently apply the law to the facts.’” Ward v. Medina, 316 Ga. 345, 349 (888 SE2d 84) (2023) (citation omitted). A petitioner seeking habeas relief bears the...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 5 de marzo de 2024
McCullum v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas de Samuel Earl McCullum por la violación y el asesinato en 1998 de Monica Blackwell y la violación de otra mujer en 1999, rechazando sus argumentos de que la evidencia era insuficiente y que la demora previa al juicio y la acumulación de cargos violaron sus derechos.
7 In Musacchio v. United States, 577 U.S. 237 (136 SCt 709, 193 LE2d 639) (2016), the United States Supreme Court reiterated that, under Jackson v. Virginia, a challenge to the constitutional sufficiency of the evidence looks to “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the pros- ecution, any rational trier of fact could have found...
MCMILLIAN, Justice, dissenting in part. Under the well-established standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SCt 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), this Court deter- mines whether evidence is sufficient as a matter of constitutional due process by examining whether “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 31 de octubre de 2024
Whitaker Farms, LLC v. Fitzgerald Fruit Farms, LLC
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia dictaminó que las declaraciones que un dueño de granja hizo durante negociaciones de acuerdo no pueden usarse para probar responsabilidad por daños punitivos, revocando una decisión de la Corte de Apelaciones que había permitido esa prueba en un juicio por invasión de una granja de duraznos.
We also note that Rule 408 (c) is virtually identical to a provision in both the 1975 and 2006 versions of Federal Rule of 5 Federal Rule of Evidence 408 (2006) provided: (a) Prohibited Uses.—Evidence of the following is not admissible on behalf of any party, when offered to prove liability for, invalidity of, or amount of a claim that was disputed as to...
“state of mind” toward the plaintiff to help establish that punitive damages should be awarded? See OCGA § 24-4-408 (a), (c). As set forth below, we resolve this case by rejecting the Court of Appeals’s application of Rule 408 (c), and therefore we answer the second question and need not address the first question posed. 2. (a) Rule 408 was enacted in 2011...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 16 de abril de 2024
Henderson v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de DeKalb que apuñaló hasta matar a su hermana de 15 años, dictaminando que la evidencia de un ataque previo con cuchillo contra otra hermana fue admitida correctamente y que no se justificaba una instrucción sobre homicidio voluntario.
2. Henderson contends the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury on the offense of voluntary manslaughter. Voluntary manslaughter is the killing of another person under circumstances that would otherwise be murder when the killer “acts solely as the result of a sudden, violent, and irresistible passion resulting from serious provocation sufficient...
“A trial court is required to grant a defendant’s request for a charge on voluntary manslaughter if there is any evidence, however slight, supporting the theory of the charge.” O’Neal v. State, 316 Ga. 264, 268 (3) (888 SE2d 42) (2023). “It is a question of law for courts to determine whether the defendant has presented sufficient evidence to warrant a...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 6 de febrero de 2024
KENNESTONE HOSPITAL, INC. v. EMORY UNIVERSITY
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia dictaminó que un certificado de necesidad para operar un hospital de cuidados agudos generales es un derecho privado, no público, porque permite a un propietario individual usar su propiedad de una manera específica.
1. Background (a) Certificates of Need The CON Act was originally enacted in 1979 to help address the General Assembly’s concerns about health care services in Geor- gia. The Act was meant to ensure that health care services and fa- cilities are “developed in an orderly and economical manner,” that “only those health care services found to be in the public...
Some facilities and services are exempt from CON require- ments. See OCGA § 31-6-47. Health care services that predated the CON Act are not new, so they are “grandfathered.” See HCA Health Svcs., Inc. v. Roach, 263 Ga. 798, 801 (3) (a) (439 SE2d 494) (1994), overruled in part on other grounds by Marsh v. Clarke County School Dist., 292 Ga. 28, 29-30 (732...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 22 de octubre de 2024
BAKER v. THE STATE (Two Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato de Prentice Baker y Verlaine Laguerre, y rechazó los argumentos de que los jurados necesitaban una advertencia especial sobre un testigo que podría haber sido cómplice y de que la falta de objeción de un abogado ante un testimonio de temor constituyó una defensa ineficaz.
2 Baker’s counsel attacked Ellis’s credibility at length, referred to Wimby’s testimony that Ellis “set [the murder] up,” and characterized Ellis as “a potential suspect” during opening statements and closing arguments. And in closing argument, Laguerre’s counsel told the jury that “nothing that [Ellis] says should make you feel good about making a decision...
(c) Ballistics and Autopsy Evidence Cara McCarthy, an expert in firearms and ballistics analysis, received and analyzed evidence collected from the crime scene. She identified 14 .223-caliber cartridge cases, which she determined were all fired from the same weapon. McCarthy explained that .223- caliber bullets are typically fired from a rifle or long gun...
Afinar los resultados
Los números cuentan los documentos que encontró esta búsqueda.