Georgia CommonsBuscar en todas las colecciones
Buscar en Georgia Commons
Proyectos de ley, opiniones de la Corte Suprema, el Código y las dos constituciones, y transcripciones de las reuniones de la Cámara y el Senado, en una sola búsqueda. Pregunte con palabras sencillas: la búsqueda ordena los pasajes por su significado y también por sus palabras.
Filtros:2023 Quitar filtros
Se encontraron 246 pasajes en 121 documentos.
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 19 de diciembre de 2023
In the Matter of Steven Ryan Webster
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia aceptó la entrega voluntaria de la licencia de abogado de un abogado, tratada como disbarment, luego de que admitiera manejar mal fondos de clientes en cinco cierres inmobiliarios distintos.
PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on a petition for voluntary discipline filed by Steven Ryan Webster (State Bar No. 745245) prior to the issuance of a formal complaint. See Bar Rule 4- 227 (b). In his petition, which concerns five underlying disciplinary matters, Webster, who has been a member of the State Bar of Georgia since 1992,...
Regarding SDBD No. 7751, Webster admits he was signed as a title insurance agent by a title company in 2013. As part of his agency agreement, Webster issued title insurance for his clients and provided various settlement services. But Webster failed to provide reconciliations for the title company’s review, failed to remit premiums collected for the title...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de febrero de 2023
In the Matter of Kara Sherrisse Lawrence
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia inhabilitó a la abogada Kara Sherrisse Lawrence después de que abandonara a un cliente de inmigración, tomara más de $5,300 sin la debida autorización, y nunca respondiera a los procedimientos disciplinarios del Colegio de Abogados Estatal.
PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of special master Catherine Koura, who recommends that Respondent Kara Sherrisse Lawrence (State Bar No. 534355) be disbarred for her multiple violations of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct (“GRPC”) in connection with her representation of a single client. See...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de junio de 2023
EFFICIENCY LODGE, INC. v. NEASON
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia anuló un fallo que exigía a un motel de estadía prolongada usar procedimientos judiciales de desalojo contra residentes de largo plazo, al determinar que los tribunales inferiores usaron la prueba legal equivocada para decidir si los residentes eran inquilinos o huéspedes de hotel.
We leave it for the trial court to apply this framework in the first instance, consistent with this opinion. 1. Background (a) Legal Framework Two legal relationships are at issue in this case. Both are be- tween a property owner and a person who occupies that property, and both are defined by statute. Under either relationship, if the occupant fails to pay...
The second relationship is that of innkeeper and guest. An inn is a “tavern[ ], hotel[ ], [or] house[ ] of public general entertainment for guests,” and a guest is “a person who pays a fee to the keeper of an inn for the purpose of entertainment at that inn.” OCGA § 43-21- 1. Unlike a landlord, an innkeeper does not need to file a writ of possession to...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 19 de septiembre de 2023
In THE MATTER OF ROBERT MALLORY CRAWFORD (Two Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia suspendió a un exjuez de tribunal superior del ejercicio de la abogacía durante tres años tras determinar que tomó dinero de un registro judicial al que no tenía derecho y mintió al respecto, rechazando la sanción más severa de inhabilitación recomendada por el juez especial disciplinario.
II. Special Master’s Recitation of the Underlying Facts In his report, the special master laid out the underlying facts as follows. In August 2002, Crawford was hired by D. C. and B. W. to answer a summons in a foreclosure action seeking a writ of possession, which concerned a property that was titled to another individual, A. T. Crawford filed a complaint...
As to the various alleged violations of Rules 1.15 (I) and (II),7 the special master stated that they were premised on the facts that 7 Rule 1.15 (I) (a) provides, in pertinent part, that “[a] lawyer shall hold funds or other property of clients or third persons that are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation separate from the lawyer’s...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 29 de junio de 2023
WELCH v. PAPPAS RESTAURANTS, INC. (Two Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia aclaró que si un delito en la propiedad de un negocio era razonablemente previsible depende de la totalidad de las circunstancias, no solo de la prueba de un delito idéntico anterior, y que normalmente es una cuestión que decide el jurado.
IV. A party rendering security services to the proprietor may owe a duty of care to third parties on the bases set out in Section 324A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. 16 Because of our holding here, we need not reach the issue of whether apportionment to a nonparty would even have been permitted under the version of OCGA § 51-12-33 (b) in effect at...
BETHEL, Justice. Collectively, these cases present an opportunity to explore the scope and nature of the liability faced by premises owners, occupiers, and security contractors in cases involving personal injuries arising from third-party criminal conduct. Although the underlying appeals vary with respect to their facts and specific issues presented, the...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de marzo de 2023
In the Matter of Willie George Davis, Jr
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia ordenó la inhabilitación del abogado Willie George Davis Jr. tras determinar que manejó indebidamente el patrimonio de su hermana y los fondos en fideicomiso de su sobrino huérfano, y desafió repetidamente las órdenes del tribunal de sucesiones.
2. Special Master’s Report and Recommendation. (a) Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. In her second report and recommendation, the Special Master summarized the procedural history of the disciplinary proceeding, including that she had granted partial summary judgment as to Davis’s violations of GRPC Rules 1.7 (a) and (b), 1.15 (I) (a) and (c), 1.15...
(1) consultation with the lawyer, pursuant to Rule 1.0 (c); (2) having received in writing reasonable and adequate information about the material risks of and reasonable available alternatives to the representation[;] and (3) having been given the opportunity to consult with independent counsel. 3 GRPC Rule 1.15 (I) (a) provides: A lawyer shall hold funds...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 13 de julio de 2023
In the Matter of Keith Chance Hardy
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia inhabilitó al abogado Keith Chance Hardy tras determinar que robó fondos de clientes, abandonó los casos de tres clientes y nunca respondió a la investigación del Colegio de Abogados del Estado.
her family; withheld information from his client and her family about his theft of her funds; and cut off all communications with the client and her family after his theft of her funds. The special master found that Hardy violated Rule 1.4 in SDBD No. 7624 because of the approximately two-year lapse of communications between him and his client; because...
9 Rule 1.15 (I) (a) provides that a “lawyer shall hold funds or other property of clients or third persons that are in a lawyer’s possession in connection with a representation separate from the lawyer’s own funds or other property”; that “[f]unds shall be kept in one or more separate accounts maintained in an approved institution”; and that “[o]ther...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 16 de mayo de 2023
King v. King, Jr
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia respondió una pregunta certificada de una corte federal de apelaciones, dictaminando que cuando alguien en una relación confidencial con otra persona también tiene deberes fiduciarios hacia ella, una falta deshonesta de divulgación puede sustentar una demanda por incumplimiento de deber fiduciario según la ley de Georgia.
1. Background On September 6, 1985, when Appellant was almost seven years old, his father died in a plane crash. After Peggy filed a wrongful death suit against the airline on her and Appellant’s behalf, she reached a settlement with the airline in 1989 that set aside at least $200,000 for Appellant’s benefit (“the Settlement Funds”). The check for the...
The district court granted summary judgment to Forrest on both the conversion and breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims after finding no evidence that Forrest used the Settlement Funds for any purpose other than for Appellant’s benefit. The district court concluded that a reasonable jury could find that naming Forrest as the custodian of the Settlement Funds...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de agosto de 2023
Jackson v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Gwinnett, y determinó que, aunque los fiscales lo interrogaron indebidamente sobre su silencio tras el arresto, el error no cambió el resultado dada la abrumadora evidencia de que apuñaló a la víctima.
On the night of August 10, Jocelyn Walker, who was staying in a room next to Jackson and Hargrove, heard a man and a woman arguing in Jackson and Hargrove’s room. Walker testified that she initially heard “fussing” but soon heard what seemed like furniture moving and “pounding” and “kicking” on the walls. Walker could not hear what the man was saying, but...
While Jackson was at the hospital, his brother asked security to check Hargrove’s room because he was still concerned about Jackson’s phone call and wanted to know what happened at the hotel. No one responded to knocks on the door, so security opened the door, went inside the room, and found Hargrove on the floor. Security called 911, and police found...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 6 de septiembre de 2023
In the Matter of Samuel Elias Skelton
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia aprobó la solicitud de Samuel Elias Skelton para ser certificado como apto para ejercer la abogacía nuevamente, después de que entregara su licencia de abogado en 2017 tras declararse culpable de robo relacionado con problemas de adicción y salud mental.
Through its investigation, the Fitness Board determined that no active grievances or other disciplinary matters against Skelton are pending before the Bar and that no restitution was required to be made to the Client Security Fund. At an informal conference convened before the Fitness Board, Skelton took full responsibility for his actions and made no...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 31 de mayo de 2023
In the Matter of David Roberson
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la decisión de negar la solicitud de David Roberson para ser readmitido en el Colegio de Abogados del Estado de Georgia, al determinar que no demostró estar rehabilitado ni haber pagado la restitución completa.
an agreement for, charge, or collect an illegal or clearly excessive fee); 31 (d) (2) (upon conclusion of a contingent fee matter, the lawyer shall provide the client with a written statement stating the following: (i) the outcome of the matter; and, (ii) if there is a recovery: (aa) the remittance to the client; (bb) the method of its determination; (cc)...
the applicant is required by the Board to produce evidence of, among other things, the taking of responsibility for past conduct, insight and appreciation for why the conduct raises fitness concerns, candor with the Board, good reputation and assurances of a desire and intention to conduct one’s self in an exemplary fashion in the future, and positive...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 16 de mayo de 2023
WARD v. THE STATE (Two Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato y agresión agravada de dos hombres que participaron en un apuñalamiento fatal en una prisión, rechazando impugnaciones a las pruebas, la seguridad de la sala, las restricciones a un testigo y una conversación privada de un fiscal con un testigo.
The next day, Ward’s counsel again objected to the police 9 CERT stands for Correctional Emergency Response Team. presence, noting that 12 officers were in the courtroom, in addition to the CERT. Dewberry’s counsel joined in the objection, and added, “I don’t think it’s necessary. . . . Particularly since he’s wearing a device that will incapacitate him...
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in making just such a judgment here. This trial was for murder and aggravated assault occurring inside a prison and involving rival gangs. All three defendants were designated maximum security inmates, and two of the defendants had substantial disciplinary records from prison. And although at least two of the...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de agosto de 2023
Annunziata v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre por un tiroteo en un club nocturno, dictaminando que el juez de primera instancia hizo bien en no decirle al jurado que podía condenarlo por el delito menor de homicidio voluntario en su lugar.
The evidence presented at Appellant’s trial showed that, in the early morning hours of May 25, 2019, Appellant arrived at a nightclub with two companions. They attempted to enter, but were not admitted, causing Appellant to become upset. Sloan Duckie, the event organizer, explained to Appellant that Appellant had paid for only one entry, and that he would...
Appellant did not leave as instructed. After Price walked back into the nightclub, Appellant began “egging [Price] on” and attempted to reenter the nightclub, telling Price to “come outside.” Surveillance footage from the nightclub’s entrance showed Appellant beckoning to someone inside the nightclub while standing outside the entrance; Price coming out of...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 15 de marzo de 2023
TAYLOR, EXR. v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION, INC. (And Vice Versa)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó el límite de $250,000 en daños punitivos de Georgia en un caso de agresión sexual contra un centro de tratamiento de Georgia, y determinó que el límite no viola el derecho a un juicio con jurado, la separación de poderes ni la igualdad de protección ante la ley.
Judgments affirmed in Case Nos. S22A1060 and S22X1061. All the Justices concur, except Colvin, J., who concurs specially as to Division III, and Ellington, J., who dissents as to Division III and concurs specially as to Division VIII. Peterson, P. J., disqualified. Ga. App. 495, 495-496 (716 SE2d 559) (2011) (discussing the party’s depositing into the court...
Taylor contends that at common law in England, defendants 25 Under OCGA § 51-3-1, “[w]here an owner or occupier of land, by express or implied invitation, induces or leads others to come upon his premises for any lawful purpose, he is liable in damages to such persons for injuries caused by his failure to exercise ordinary care in keeping the premises and...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 7 de noviembre de 2023
In the Matter of Walter Douglas Adams
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia suspendió al abogado Walter Douglas Adams por un año y le ordenó reembolsar $2,732.81 a una exclienta, rechazando la recomendación del Special Master de inhabilitarlo por un acuerdo disputado de $7,000.
Counsel for the State Bar asked Adams to send him a copy of the check, and while Adams responded, he did not send a copy of the check. Counsel again asked via email for a copy of the check, and he responded in a letter: I do need to correct a misstatement in my letter to you of August 12, 2020. I do have the check, which is made payable to me and it has...
Adams violated Rule 1.5 (a), insofar as he charged and intended to keep an unreasonable fee now that he has deposited the $7,000 check. He also violated Rule 1.5 (c) (1) by failing to put the contingency fee agreement in writing in regard to the personal injury and the Trans Union matters, and in regard to the Trans Union matter, failing to state the method...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 5 de julio de 2023
In the Matter of Richard H. Middleton, Jr
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia aceptó la solicitud de un abogado de Savannah de renunciar a su licencia de abogado luego de admitir que retuvo indebidamente el dinero de un acuerdo de $100,000 de un cliente en su cuenta fiduciaria para uso personal.
PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the petition for voluntary surrender of license filed by Richard H. Middleton, Jr., (State Bar No. 504912) before the issuance of a formal complaint. See Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2). In this petition, Middleton admits that in connection with a single client matter he violated Rules 1.15 (I) (c) and 1.15...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 11 de octubre de 2023
State v. COOK (Six Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia dictaminó que los carceleros del condado de Fulton acusados en la muerte de un recluso no son 'agentes de la paz' con derecho a un aviso especial previo a la acusación formal, porque vigilar a los reclusos dentro de una cárcel no es lo mismo que mantener la paz pública en la comunidad.
6 See, e.g., Robert Watkins et al., Digest of the Laws of Georgia, p. 532 (1799) (Act No. 499, Dec. 19, 1793) (“[I]t shall be the duty of the justices of this State . . . on issuing a warrant, to apprehend any person or persons charged with any criminal offence, to direct the peace officer executing the same, to make diligent enquiry as to the property, of...
9 Both the Georgia Code and Georgia appellate decisions have employed “peace officer” as a collective term to encompass what are now generally considered to be law enforcement officers, such as sheriffs, police officers, and marshals. See, e.g., Penal Code 1910, § 338 (“Any person who shall, without authority, exercise or attempt to exercise the functions...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 19 de diciembre de 2023
CLEMENTS v. THE STATE (Two Cases)
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó las condenas por asesinato de London Clements y Eric Velazquez, ambos relacionados con la muerte a tiros de un agente del condado de Hall durante una serie de robos y una persecución policial en julio de 2019.
The evidence presented at trial showed that, on the morning of July 2, 2019, two residents of Hall County discovered that their vehicles had been stolen overnight and reported the thefts to law enforcement. On the afternoon of July 7, law enforcement officers discovered the stolen vehicles — a 2009 red Dodge Caliber and a 2002 silver Toyota Avalon — parked...
While investigating the pawnshop burglaries on the morning of July 6, law enforcement officers learned that several automobile dealerships had also been broken into overnight, including Los Plebes Auto Sales, Texano Auto Sales, Texas Trucks and Autos, and Eddie’s Auto Sales.4 Francisco Cuella, the owner of Los Plebes Auto Sales, testified that, when he...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 2 de noviembre de 2023
Jenkins v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia revocó las condenas de Larry Jenkins por doble asesinato, dictaminando que su clara solicitud de un abogado mientras era ingresado en la cárcel fue una invocación válida de sus derechos Miranda, aunque un interrogatorio formal aún no había comenzado.
Captain Doug Lewis with the Department of Natural Resources — who had been working alongside other law enforcement agencies to help secure the crime scene — testified that he also heard a radio call reporting that a white van had been seen in Jesup by the overpass and that law enforcement was requesting assistance for “some people that were fleeing” from...
LAGRUA, Justice, dissenting. Because Jenkins did not invoke his right to counsel during a custodial interrogation and because there is no legal authority to support the majority opinion’s conclusion that a defendant can invoke his Miranda rights when “a reasonable person in [the defendant’s] position” believes “an interrogation is imminent,” I conclude that...
Opinión de la Corte Suprema · Supreme Court of Georgia · 21 de agosto de 2023
Reese v. State
Resumen de Georgia Commons (escrito con IA): La Corte Suprema de Georgia confirmó la condena por asesinato de un hombre del condado de Fulton, rechazando sus reclamos de que el juez de primera instancia debió instruir al jurado sobre legítima defensa y sobre el testimonio de un cómplice, y de que su abogado defensor fue ineficaz.
(a) Reese contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress what he says was unlawfully obtained evidence. Reese specifically argues that the key ring with the yellow tag and the shell casings recovered from Reese’s yard, as well as the evidence that Reese’s house was equipped with surveillance cameras, should have been...
Reese’s front yard, which was visible from two public streets. Although his back yard was fenced, his front yard was not. Nor was there “any type of privacy screen or anything else” blocking the yard from view. Detective Rittberg conducted a “grid search” of Reese’s front yard “after 5:04 [a.m.],” around two hours after the shooting, and conducted a “grass...
Afinar los resultados
Los números cuentan los documentos que encontró esta búsqueda.